# LES quality assessement

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
 September 4, 2013, 15:12 LES quality assessement #1 New Member   mira Join Date: Jun 2011 Posts: 6 Rep Power: 8 Sponsored Links Hello everybody! How can I get the resolved turbulent kinetic energy and the subgrid turbulent kinetic energy for an LES simulation with CFD-Post? I want to compare the resolved part with the modeled one, to assess the quality of LES calculated with CFX nice greetings
 Sponsored Links

 September 4, 2013, 17:53 #2 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 13,718 Rep Power: 106 Which LES model are you using? To get the resolved turbulent kinetic energy you need to do some mathematics on your results file. You need to split the velocity field into a mean flow and turbulent component. You can do that by time averaging, spatial averaging or ensemble averaging (for a periodic flow like an IC engine). Once you have the average you can evaluate the resolved turbulent component.

 September 5, 2013, 07:30 #3 New Member   mira Join Date: Jun 2011 Posts: 6 Rep Power: 8 Actually, I am using the Smagorinsky model. Lead these ways of averaging to same results? For time avergaing, shall I calculate an area averaged turbulent kinetic energy for each transient file, then calculate the mean values over time? Do you know, how can I get that with CFD-POST? Thank you!

 September 5, 2013, 08:21 #4 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 13,718 Rep Power: 106 It is a bit tricky with the Smagorinsky model, it is a dissipative model with no explicit sub grid kinetic energy component. If you hunt through the turbulence modelling textbooks you might find something but I cannot recall off the top of my head what it is. No, the three methods of averging I mentioned do not usually lead to the same results. That would be far too simple . No, do not do a area averaged k then time averge that. That would be some weirdo space and time average. The literature does one or the other and that makes sense to me. To do time averaging you have to activate the time averaging options in the CFX-Pre output file tab. To do spatial averaging you can do that on a results file in post-processing - but it is not simple, you have to define a averaging length scale and there are no simple functions in CFX I know of to do that.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post shuangqingx Main CFD Forum 13 August 21, 2013 19:53 eelcovv OpenFOAM 0 June 8, 2010 11:35 Anorky ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 8 March 22, 2010 04:25 Bin Li Main CFD Forum 2 February 20, 2004 10:58 Ales Skotak Main CFD Forum 1 July 23, 1999 09:46

 Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top