CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   CFX (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/cfx/)
-   -   Basic explanation of turbulence models (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/cfx/124641-basic-explanation-turbulence-models.html)

Ashh October 10, 2013 00:01

Basic explanation of turbulence models
 
I've been searching for a while for a low-level description of how the turbulence models work and am not finding very much. So far I have:

K-e:
Uses turbulence energy (K) and it's rate of dissipation (e). Good standard model that works in most industrially relevant cases.
Not good with:
- flow reattachment
- flow seperation
- flow recovery


SST:
Uses K-e in free flow and K-w (w is the frequency of eddie currents) which is better for wall boundary layers.
- bad with flow recovery after flow reattachment


BSL:
Baseline Reynolds Model? Can be used with a rougher mesh?

SSG:
Speziale-Sarkar-Gatski. Better than BSL for high Reynolds numbers?

As you can see I have pretty much no information on BSL and SSG. Any information will be greatly appreciated!

Cheers
Ash :)

pz21 October 10, 2013 02:29

Dear Ash,
I suggest that the help documentation of any CFD code may help you. For example, the section of "Turbulence Models" in CFX Modeling Guide offers a basic capability description of various turbulence models. And the Theory Guide tells how these turbulence models work.
Sorry for no detailed information to help you.

ghorrocks October 10, 2013 05:12

The turbulence modelling textbook "turbulence Modelling for CFD" by Wilcox is a excellent textbook in this area.

To correct some of your points:
- k-e, has known problems at stagnation points, separations (both detactment and reattachment) but pretty good for bulk flows. Very poor at rotating flows and anisotropic turbulence.
- SST - better at all these conditions, has models available which might help for rotating flows and turbulence transition and a few other special cases. This should be your default selection for a turbulence model unless you have a very good reason to choose something else.
- All the Reynolds stress models - can capture flow rotation and anisotropic turbulence, but rarely end up being much more accurate than a reasonable 2-eqn model anyway due to the large number of assumptions required to get them to work. Also devilishly hard to converge.
- And then there is DES, SAS, LES, DNS - these are advanced models which you should only consider when you have a good knowledge of turbulence models. Using them without knowing what they do is a receipe for disaster.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:00.