|
[Sponsors] |
October 11, 2013, 09:58 |
multiphase subdomain increasing mesh density
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello to all, in the cfx reference guide "CFX Best Practices Guide for Multiphase" there is an interesting advice for getting good results with multiphase flows: "A technique to increase the mesh density in the region of a liquid-gas interface is to create a subdomain which occupies the same region as the liquid (or gas) phase, and inflate the mesh in both directions from the edge of the subdomain, as shown in Figure 10.1 (p. 124). The inflation layers can increase the resolution in the region of the interface and enhance the results." Unfortunately there are no more informations. Does anyone knows an example, a tutorial or another description showing the technique? If not, has anyone experience with that and could explain how to do? Thanks! |
|
October 12, 2013, 06:31 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143 |
I have tried this but without much success. And as most of my free surface models have surface tension (which means you need 1:1 aspect ratio elements) and the free surface moves a lot I do not find this technique very useful.
So the described technique in the manual is only useful if the free surface does not move much, and if surface tension is nto being used. |
|
October 14, 2013, 03:46 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 12 |
Oh thanks for the hints.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Star CCM Overset Mesh Error (Rotating Turbine) | thezack | Siemens | 7 | October 12, 2016 11:14 |
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 09:38 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 06:20 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 21:11 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 18:10 |