CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Buoyancy reference density for combustion simulation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 20, 2014, 07:32
Default Buoyancy reference density for combustion simulation
  #1
New Member
 
Bostjan
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 17
brajh11 is on a distinguished road
I am trying to do a simulation for gas phase combustion in CFX.

I am not sure which is the most adequate Buoyancy reference density for such a kind of flow.

Is Buoyancy reference density must be set up for standard conditions (273 K and 1 atm)?
brajh11 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 20, 2014, 18:04
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
No. The reference condition should be set to a representative condition in your model. If the burner is running at 3 bar and 1000K then use that as the reference condition.

The reference condition is used to reduce round off errors. So you want to make the deviation from the reference condition a minimum across the entire simulation.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 22, 2014, 18:33
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
JuPa's Avatar
 
Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 361
Rep Power: 14
JuPa is on a distinguished road
This thread is probably a good place to ask:

I'm doing phase change simulations (flash evaporation) with continuous liquid (water) and continuous vapour (water vapour) phases.

Should the buoyancy reference density be close to the density of the continuous liquid (water) or continuous vapour (water vapour)?
JuPa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2014, 06:35
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
This is discussed in the documentation. The recommendation is to use the density of the lighter fluid.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2014, 07:40
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Bostjan
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 17
brajh11 is on a distinguished road
ghorrocks: I know that the Buoyancy reference density should be set to a representative condition in CFD model.

In my CFD model for combustion simulation density of flue gases vary from 1.287 kg/m3 (at 273 K) to 0.234 kg/m3 (at 1500 K). I have tried to define Buoyancy reference density as a expression which is temperature dependent but it is not allowed. CFX said:The parameter 'Buoyancy Reference Density' is defined to be Single Valued but it depends on the field variable: T

Any idea how to fix this problem?
brajh11 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2014, 11:35
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
JuPa's Avatar
 
Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 361
Rep Power: 14
JuPa is on a distinguished road
Read up in the theory guide on how CFX deals with buoyancy - ergo I don't think it's a good idea to have it set as a variable which depends on Temperature.

I think the best option to take is set it to the mean density in your domain.
JuPa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2014, 16:54
Default
  #7
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
If the reference condition is a variable then it is not much of a reference, is it.....

The reference condition needs to be a constant. Use the mean density, as Mr CFD says. If you are worried about it, do a sensitivity analysis - try a range of values and see if it makes a difference. If you have a stable solution it should make no difference.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Second Derivative Zero - Boundary Condition fu-ki-pa OpenFOAM 11 March 27, 2021 04:28
wmake problems during custom utility compilation palazi88 OpenFOAM Programming & Development 11 August 13, 2018 20:52
Installing OpenFOAM-1.5-dev on a cluster ZKM OpenFOAM Installation 4 December 25, 2010 15:59
compile error about FJMPI chiven OpenFOAM Installation 11 March 31, 2010 06:27
Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue Miguel Baritto CFX 4 August 31, 2006 12:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:55.