CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Calculate in CFD-Post the term viscous work of the CFX output

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By Opaque

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 22, 2021, 22:22
Default Calculate in CFD-Post the term viscous work of the CFX output
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 7
jmenendez is on a distinguished road
Hello

In the CFX solver output, in the H-Energy energy balance, terms like this appear:

Code:
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
 |                            H-Energy-S1                             |
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
 Boundary         : S1 Hub                                 -5.9921E-01
 Boundary         : S1 Outlet                              -2.5992E+02
 Bnd Src/Visc Work: S1 Outlet                              -1.4649E-04
 Boundary         : S1 Shroud                              -7.2303E-01
 Bnd Src/Visc Work: S1 to R1 Side 1                         6.6730E-02
 Domain Src (Neg) : S1                                     -3.5928E+01
 Domain Src (Pos) : S1                                      3.5928E+01
 Domain Interface : R1 to S1 (Side 2)                       2.6110E+02
                                                           -----------
 Domain Imbalance :                                        -7.3914E-02
How can I calculate that term: Bnd Src/Visc Work: R1 Shroud 8.3414E-01, in CFD-Post, what function and variable should I use? I've been reading the manual but I haven't found anything to solve my doubt.

Another important question.

The term viscous dissipation is by definition always positive, why in my oulet is it negative?

This simulation has no sources, simply a fluid domain in a compressor, SST turbulence model, and non-adiabatic conditions (fixed temperature walls). The fluid is real gas. It's not a heat conjugate problem

thank you very much for any help
jmenendez is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2021, 04:15
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Viscous dissipation is turned on by default. In most cases it adds a negligible amount of heat to the fluid - your case is an example of this. It is negative as heat added is positive. The sign of heat addition or removal is arbitrary, you just need to be consistent.

I do not know of a way of visualising the viscous work component by itself. But as it is so small is it really worth worrying about?

If you don't like the viscous work term you can turn it off. Then re-run your simulation and you will have no viscous work and the world will be much simpler.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2021, 06:13
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 7
jmenendez is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
Viscous dissipation is turned on by default. In most cases it adds a negligible amount of heat to the fluid - your case is an example of this. It is negative as heat added is positive. The sign of heat addition or removal is arbitrary, you just need to be consistent.

I do not know of a way of visualising the viscous work component by itself. But as it is so small is it really worth worrying about?

If you don't like the viscous work term you can turn it off. Then re-run your simulation and you will have no viscous work and the world will be much simpler.
Dear ghorrocks,

That term isn't always that insignificant. There are many publications that consider it. In my case I am simulating small-scale turbomachines with ultra high speeds (300 krpm, 15 mm inlet), and this term is capital for the energy balance. They are machines where the smallest Reynolds number involves significant losses. The above imbalance is an example of the inlet, but in the impeller I have other values.

Thank you very much for your advice, regards.
jmenendez is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2021, 08:57
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,803
Rep Power: 32
Opaque will become famous soon enough
Careful with the vocabulary here.

Viscous work and viscous dissipation are not the same thing. They are "siblings" , but careful they should not be confused.

Viscous work = div (tau : v)

Viscous dissipation = viscosity * || Sij ||^2

If you expand the viscous work term, you will obtain two terms: viscous dissipation (irreversible component > 0) and a second term (reversible component). The reversible component cancels out within the domain, see Domain Src always having the exact value with opposite signs. At the boundary, their value comes in, and it is NOT negligible at moving walls.

See work by Lyman,
https://www.semanticscholar.org/pape...3cd326cf81b59f

Hope the above helps
Procyon and aero_head like this.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2021, 09:09
Default
  #5
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 7
jmenendez is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opaque View Post
Careful with the vocabulary here.

Viscous work and viscous dissipation are not the same thing. They are "siblings" , but careful they should not be confused.

Viscous work = div (tau : v)

Viscous dissipation = viscosity * || Sij ||^2

If you expand the viscous work term, you will obtain two terms: viscous dissipation (irreversible component > 0) and a second term (reversible component). The reversible component cancels out within the domain, see Domain Src always having the exact value with opposite signs. At the boundary, their value comes in, and it is NOT negligible at moving walls.

See work by Lyman,
https://www.semanticscholar.org/pape...3cd326cf81b59f

Hope the above helps
Sorry, English is not my native language and the concepts have no equal translation.

I need to count any amount of heat in the micro-turbomachine impeller. These are not large quantities and, as you may have seen in other threads I have created, I am having a lot of trouble obtaining them. These machines have a non-adibaticity problem, and it becomes necessary to measure this term.

They are not like large turbomachines which are generally considered adiabatic (except when cooling blades, etc.)

Thank you very much again
jmenendez is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cfx 19.4, heat balance


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFD post does not work zhandos_baizhuma CFX 5 December 2, 2022 02:19
CFD Salary CFD Main CFD Forum 17 January 3, 2017 17:09
Capturing the output from DOS system command using PERL in CFX Macro pavitran CFX 0 May 17, 2016 06:36
CFD Design...The CFD Future John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 20 November 19, 2015 23:40
Calculate Force at different points in CFX Post niraj12321 CFX 5 July 26, 2010 18:39


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:43.