This approach appears to be very sensitive to the global imbalances. Try converging to tighter imbalances and see if that improves things.
|
2 Attachment(s)
Hi ghorrocks,
thx for your fast answer! I'm an absolute newcomer in cfd-practice. What do you mean with "converging to tighter imbalances". I have choosen a huge control volume sourrounding the wing (wingdept x 100 x100 x 800) and for first evaluations a rough unstructured grid. For better results I will refine the Mesh with Prism Layers around the wing. Is the formulation of my expression: "0.5*Density*areaInt((Velocity v)^2+(Velocity w)^2)@OUT" equal to the above shown formula? Attachment 38546 Attachment 38547 |
Quote:
And while you are at it, you transition very quickly from fine mesh on the wing to coarse mesh further away. This will also be a problem, especially if you are trying to pick up small differences in the momentum field. Have a look in the literature at the sort of meshed they use - you will find the transition is much gentler, and they usually have a tail of fine mesh in the wake region (which is where your momentum deficit will exist). |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:33. |