CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Radiation model for Fluid-solid interface

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Opaque

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 28, 2015, 02:43
Default Radiation model for Fluid-solid interface
  #1
Senior Member
 
---------
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 303
Rep Power: 17
saisanthoshm88 is on a distinguished road
I have a query regarding the radiation model to be used in cases where Fluid-solid interfaces are involved.
Here is an excerpt from the Ansys CFX solver modelling guide that tends to clarify upon this -
"For domain interfaces using the Conservative Interface Flux option, the radiation model must be the same
on both sides of the interface. That is, for Fluid-Solid, Solid-Solid, or Porous-Solid domain interfaces, the
Monte Carlo model is the only available option."

However, in a workshop for electronics cooling from the Ansys CFX Introductory training material, a discrete transfer model is used on the Fluid side of the Fluid-solid interface and the solid side of that interface is left to Monte carlo.

Could someone please provide a clarification on this.
__________________
Best regards,
Santhosh.
saisanthoshm88 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2015, 08:44
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,804
Rep Power: 32
Opaque will become famous soon enough
You are not giving a complete description of the model, and it is subject to misinterpretations.

You can have different radiation models setup across a domain interface as long as the boundary condition is NOT "Conservative Interface Flux" as described in the documentation.

From the statement above, and because Monte Carlo is the only available model for solid domains, the reverse is that a domain interface can only use the "Conservative Interface Flux" option for Fluid-Solid, Solid-Solid, Porous-Solid if Monte Carlo is used on both sides.

If another option is used, i.e. opaque boundary, the models on either side are independent.

To clarify your electronics example, you need the following information:

Radiation Model Fluid Side = ??
Radiation Model Solid Side = ??
Thermal Radiation Boundary Condition Option = ??

It is impossible to answer if the setup makes sense, w/o those 3 answers, you only described the first 2.

As far as I know, it is not possible in the ANSYS CFX-Pre interface to setup a case with

Radiation Model Fluid Side = DTM
Radiation Model Solid Side = MC
Thermal Radiation Boundary Condition Option = ConservativeInterfaceFlux

Hope the above helps,
miaolong likes this.
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Radiation interface hinca CFX 15 January 26, 2014 17:11
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 03:32
CFX13 Post Periodic interface EtaEta CFX 7 December 8, 2011 17:15
increasing mesh quality is leading to poor convergence tippo CFX 2 May 5, 2009 10:55
definition difficulty-->DO radiation model Harry Qiu FLUENT 0 March 29, 2001 09:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33.