CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Expert Parametrs doubt CFX

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By ghorrocks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 2, 2015, 09:56
Default Expert Parametrs doubt CFX
  #1
Senior Member
 
Talles Caio
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Brazil
Posts: 101
Rep Power: 13
TallesC is on a distinguished road
Guys, I'm working on a hard reactive system monofasico.Logo at the beginning occurs the following problem:
Newton's method warnings at: END OF TIME STEP |
+ ------------------------------------------------- ------------------- +
+ ------------------------------------------------- ------------------- +
| |
| Newton's method failed to converge while computing the variables |
| Listed below. In each case, the solver continued with the variable |
| The field it was on the last iteration. |
| |
| If this situation persists, you might try decreasing the Newton |
| Iteration underrelaxation factor. This can be changed by setting |
| Following one of the parameters for your mixture: |
| |
| Temperature: "Constitutive Relation Under Relaxation" |
| Pressure: "Newton Under Pressure Relaxation" |
| |
+ ------------------------------------------------- ------------------- +
| |
| Location Name: Serpentine |
| Mesh location: Vertex |
| Routine: UPD_LOCALE_PROP1 |
| Partition: 12 |
| Variable Name: Temperature |
| Last 3 Changes: 1.01653E 1.15153E + 30 + 30 + 30 1.09939E |
| Tolerance: 1.0000E-02 |
| Status: Diverging |
| Max Iterations: 100

already checked the fluid properties, expressions, boundary conditions. one option would be acting on expert parameters Does anyone know where I can change the expert parametrs the following variables pressure and temperature?
TallesC is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 2, 2015, 19:02
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
I would look at numerical stability problems before the expert parameters. Try double precision numerics, better mesh quality, a better initial condition and/or smaller time steps.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 16, 2019, 08:32
Default
  #3
Member
 
Abdullah Arslan
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 7
Goenitz is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by TallesC View Post
Guys, I'm working on a hard reactive system monofasico.Logo at the beginning occurs the following problem:
Newton's method warnings at: END OF TIME STEP |
+ ------------------------------------------------- ------------------- +
+ ------------------------------------------------- ------------------- +
| |
| Newton's method failed to converge while computing the variables |
| Listed below. In each case, the solver continued with the variable |
| The field it was on the last iteration. |
| |
| If this situation persists, you might try decreasing the Newton |
| Iteration underrelaxation factor. This can be changed by setting |
| Following one of the parameters for your mixture: |
| |
| Temperature: "Constitutive Relation Under Relaxation" |
| Pressure: "Newton Under Pressure Relaxation" |
| |
+ ------------------------------------------------- ------------------- +
| |
| Location Name: Serpentine |
| Mesh location: Vertex |
| Routine: UPD_LOCALE_PROP1 |
| Partition: 12 |
| Variable Name: Temperature |
| Last 3 Changes: 1.01653E 1.15153E + 30 + 30 + 30 1.09939E |
| Tolerance: 1.0000E-02 |
| Status: Diverging |
| Max Iterations: 100

already checked the fluid properties, expressions, boundary conditions. one option would be acting on expert parameters Does anyone know where I can change the expert parametrs the following variables pressure and temperature?
same problem.. have you solved it?
Goenitz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 16, 2019, 18:20
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,700
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
It is unlikely you got this problem from the same method as the previous post. As I said before, this is a sign of numerical instability, so you should look at issues which contribute to numerical instability.
Goenitz likes this.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFX Treatment of Laminar and Turbulent Flows Jade M CFX 18 September 15, 2022 07:08
Different flow pattern between OpenFOAM and CFX AirS OpenFOAM 0 January 12, 2010 07:08
heat generation in CFX Ema CFX 4 August 7, 2009 05:39
CFX 10's solutions differ from CFX 5.7's Atit Koonsrisuk CFX 4 July 26, 2006 11:59
FSI using CFX and ANSYS Bi Chang CFX 2 May 10, 2005 04:47


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:53.