CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Y+ value for SST turbulence model

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 17, 2015, 16:49
Default Y+ value for SST turbulence model
  #1
Member
 
beyonder
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 67
Rep Power: 7
beyonder1 is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I have cascade of airfoils with inlet speed=20m/s and chord length=15.2. The airfoils are oscillating few degrees and hence there is mesh deformation. The reynolds no. is around 0.2 million. I am running the simulation on cfx. I did some research, read wiki pages and concluded that SST model could be best choice. But i have some doubt regarding choosing Y+ value as SST asks for low value. I dont know if my mesh is fine enough.
I also know about mesh independence study as a way of finding out but i would like some expert suggestion about choosing turbulence model and Y+ importance for my case(explained in first line).
beyonder1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 17, 2015, 19:39
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 16,595
Rep Power: 128
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
Generate a mesh which you think is close and run it. Then generate the mesh again with all mesh length settings halved. This should generate a mesh with approximately 8 times as many nodes. Run it and compare it to the first one. If the two results are similar enough that you are happy with it then you can use the coarser mesh. If not then you need to halve it again until you do get an accuracy you are happy with.

You can also do this for the boundary layer mesh only to work out what y+ you need.

There are also more sophisticated ways of doing this using Richardson extrapolation.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 18, 2015, 04:55
Default
  #3
Member
 
beyonder
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 67
Rep Power: 7
beyonder1 is on a distinguished road
I understand what you are saying and i am currently doing it. I want to know if there is some restriction on Y+ value(less or greater than some value) for SST to work efficiently. Also does SST an appropriate choice or do i have to vary the turbulence model too?
beyonder1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 18, 2015, 06:46
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 16,595
Rep Power: 128
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
Yes, SST is an appropriate choice.

SST is theoretically valid for all y+ so do not restrict yourself to a y+ value. But numerical reality means that if y+ is too big you will not have adequate resolution of the boundary layer and if y+ is too small you will not converge due to numerical round off errors.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 6, 2016, 08:28
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
urosgrivc
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Slovenija
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 8
urosgrivc is on a distinguished road
As i understand, SST switches to DNS near wals if y+ is lower than ~11. if it is from 0 to 300 it should be sufficient, but with y+ values above 100 I dont suspect geting any relevant results from the simulation, I usualy keep it mostly under 5 (train brake rotor cooling). And if you are simulating aerofoils where there are high gradients of pressure and velocity, good near wall resolving is wery important, I stay belov 1 with y+ when near wall results are important.
As you probably need forces for cd as a result, the smaller the better but under a surtan walue results wont change anymore and that is enough. Problem is that with such small elements node count gets quite big and than computational time begins to be a problem.

please correct me if I'm wrong

Last edited by urosgrivc; January 7, 2016 at 09:58.
urosgrivc is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 7, 2016, 19:30
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 16,595
Rep Power: 128
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
SST does not switch to DNS. It is a RANS turbulence model. It does however switch to integration to the wall.

Your other comments are generally correct, but I think you have missed the point a little bit. If wall functions adequately model the flow then there is no need to use y+<11 and integrate to the wall. So it is whether wall functions are adequate or not which determine whether you should integrate to the wall or use wall functions.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Error in Two phase (condensation) modeling adilsyyed CFX 15 June 24, 2015 20:42
Overflow Error in Multiphase Modelling with Two Continuous Fluids ashtonJ CFX 6 August 11, 2014 15:32
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: volo87 CFX 5 June 14, 2013 18:44
Wrong calculation of nut in the kOmegaSST turbulence model FelixL OpenFOAM Bugs 27 March 27, 2012 10:02
Low Reynolds k-epsilon model YJZ ANSYS 1 August 20, 2010 14:57


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:12.