CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Particles in air flow

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 14, 2015, 02:17
Default Particles in air flow
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 10
BachelorM7 is on a distinguished road
Hello.

We are working on a bachelor about optimization of an ejector.
A quick overview of the structure:
There are two inlets and an outlet. In one of the inlets water flows, which is delivered by a pump. In the second inlet particles/powder will be sucked up from a bag. The water and the powder is mixed and leaving the ejector through the outlet.
The issues are: how do I add both powder and air at the other inlet?


Best regards
Anette
Student
Engineering College of Aarhus
Denmark
BachelorM7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2015, 07:29
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
How are you modelling the powder? As lagrangian particles or as a eularian phase? And most importantly - why did you make that choice of multiphase model?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2015, 07:34
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 10
BachelorM7 is on a distinguished road
I don't know how I am modelling the powder jet. That is one more question who needs to be answered.
We got the model as I described it from a company, which we are doing the simulation for. I don't know if that was an answer on your question about multiphase?
BachelorM7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2015, 07:40
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
The boundary condition is implemented in very different ways between the two methods.

So it looks like you first better understand the difference between Eularian and Lagrangian particle models and select the one most suited to your application.

At first glance I would suspect that a powder is too fine with too many particles for a Lagrangian model, so a Eularian model would be more suitable. But you should look into that and confirm it.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2015, 07:46
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 10
BachelorM7 is on a distinguished road
The powder is so fine, that it can't nearly be seen in a microscope, so the Eulerian model seems correct, but I will look furter into it.
But how can I set both powder AND air as material in one inlet?
BachelorM7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2015, 07:53
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
So one inlet is pure water, and one inlet is powder and air? Is that right?

What does the air and water form? bubbles? drops? Fluid slugs? foam? stays separate with a clear interface?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2015, 07:59
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 10
BachelorM7 is on a distinguished road
That is right!

We don't know what happen inside the ejector. We are just interested in to mix the powder and water. But when the powder is sucked out of the bag, air is also sucked with. Therefore, we need to add both powder and air to the inlet.
BachelorM7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2015, 08:02
Default
  #8
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
But again, the choice of multiphase model depends on the form the air/water fluid takes. I guess the air is fine bubbles and the volume fraction of the bubbles is quite small - is that correct?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2015, 08:27
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 10
BachelorM7 is on a distinguished road
We also see that the volume fraction of air is quite small. But we don’t know the exact volume fraction of the air bubbles.
BachelorM7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2015, 19:21
Default
  #10
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
It is starting to look like a eularian multiphase model should work here. You will have water as the continuous phase with air as a eularian bubble phase and powder as a eularian particle phase.

Then the boundary conditions are set by setting the volume fractions of the components.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 15, 2015, 02:53
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 10
BachelorM7 is on a distinguished road
It sounds interesting. How do we add continuous phase, eulerian bubble phase and eularian particle phase to the model in CFX?
BachelorM7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 18, 2015, 19:43
Default
  #12
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Have a look at the CFX tutorial examples.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 20, 2015, 03:58
Default
  #13
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 10
BachelorM7 is on a distinguished road
Now we are using: air = "continuous fluid", water = "continuous fluid" and powder = "dispersed solid". How does that sound?
We have tried "particle transport solid", but we can't figure out how to use "volume fraction" in this model? If it is possible?
BachelorM7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 20, 2015, 05:28
Default
  #14
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
That sounds suitable if you have a distinct air/water interface which you intend to resolve. If the air is bubbles then air needs to be dispersed bubbles.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
trying to simulate two-phase jet flow with particles in surface injection ajkratos FLUENT 5 March 3, 2015 21:33
flow Maldistribution in air conditioning rgd FLUENT 0 July 29, 2013 11:34
DPM for steady flow with unsteady particles tracking yahya FLUENT 0 March 28, 2013 13:28
Simulation of air flow inside valve - FSI? Help! farianka Main CFD Forum 0 April 17, 2011 16:30
How to set correct mass flow rate for lagrangian particles ? sankarv OpenFOAM 0 April 19, 2010 11:40


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23.