|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
Hi,
Any strategies to decrease the mesh quality to circumvent around the "numerical size limit error." I tried doing a Body Sizing and jacked the Element size for all bodies really high, but it doesnt seem to be making any difference whatsoever... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,017
Rep Power: 146 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I presume you meant quantity, not quality.
Where are you getting the numerical size limit error? Try the geometry and meshing forum for tips on meshing. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 10:38 |
| Polyhedral Mesh Quality in Star-CCM+ | niazaliahmed | STAR-CCM+ | 3 | March 8, 2012 14:51 |
| [ICEM] Tetra mesh quality before and after prism layer | Chander | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | December 25, 2011 23:04 |
| fluent add additional zones for the mesh file | SSL | FLUENT | 2 | January 26, 2008 12:55 |
| Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |