|
[Sponsors] |
horizontal axis wind turbine- Issue in interface b/w stationary and rotating domain. |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Sreejith B K
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Hello everyone,.
I am new in CFX. I simulated horizontal axis wind turbine through MRF approach. Rotating domain with turbine blade kept inside stationary domain. Boundary conditions; stationary : Velocity inlet, pressure outlet slip walls for top and bottom and periodic for side wall (120 deg sect). Rotating : blade - no slip wall, side walls rotational periodic. interfaces with stationary domain - frozen rotor>pitch-none . My simulation got converged. The problem is rotating domain is not interacting with outer domain. I don't know where i made mistake. Please help me....!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Frozen rotor > Pitch change = Automatic
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
Sreejith B K
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Thank you turbo for your reply,
I tried automatic and pitch value (0.1, 0.7). But no significant changes observed. here i attached velocity contour at side 1 and side 2 of interface at outlet. I compared my CFX setup with a CFX Pre setup downloaded from the same forum. The only difference i felt is, the number of mesh element on both sides of interface are not exactly equal in my case. Does it matter? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
The automatic is what it does for dissimilar meshes at the interface. Your problem looks to be somewhere else. Try a temporary model that has no upper stationary domain but the upstream and downstream only, i.e., an axial model of S1-R1-S2 with the frozen rotor automatic interface. Apply a stationary wall to the upper side. See how it goes. And then go back to your model. You will debug the issue. I suspect a mesh-related problem.
Last edited by turbo; February 6, 2016 at 09:20. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
New Member
Sreejith B K
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Thank you turbo for your kind reply.
I will try it... I did meshes for inner and outer domains as separate mesh files. Then imported both mesh files one by one into CFX and gave all boundary conditions. I have not given any interface coupling ( as in fluent) other than frozen rotor options. Did I made any mistake here? Can you please suggest what are the things that i can do for mesh modifications ? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
New Member
Sreejith B K
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Thank you turbo.
I tried with a rectangular block instead of blade with similar boundary conditions. There everything works fine. So i guess something is wrong in blade mashing, not boundary conditions...!! Am I right? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
boundary condition, cfx, wind turbine |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wind turbine simulation | Saturn | CFX | 58 | July 3, 2020 01:13 |
Basic Nozzle-Expander Design | karmavatar | CFX | 20 | March 20, 2016 08:44 |
Wrong flow in ratating domain problem | Sanyo | CFX | 17 | August 15, 2015 06:20 |
Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Rotating Domain Problems | TWaung | CFX | 4 | May 1, 2012 03:14 |
RPM in Wind Turbine | Pankaj | CFX | 9 | November 23, 2009 04:05 |