|
[Sponsors] |
May 21, 2016, 06:03 |
|
#21 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143 |
I think the laplacian vol weighted smoothing option you chose only applies to surface tension. Not sure on that, but I am sure it does not smooth the general VF field so it is not what you want.
What do you mean "nothing happen?" When correctly applied that creates a circular smeared interface. If nothing happens then you have not applied it correctly. |
|
May 21, 2016, 06:55 |
|
#22 |
Senior Member
yaseen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Hawler
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 10 |
may be due to wrong applied but in documentation, does not said what is (x,y) coord.
is x horizontal and y vertical, also in my case both x and z horozontal and y vertical, so I suprised what I do!!!, the second one the radius r = 0.3 m for my case is very big dimension, is that related to mesh size my mesh (0.01 m), thirdly what does that mean x,y (0.5,0.5), this is according to what? main corrdinate location. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to transform (mass flow rate) boundary condition from 3D to 2D? | nurul efha | FLUENT | 8 | May 9, 2023 11:56 |
mass flow inlet and pressure outlet with target mass flow rate | Zigainer | FLUENT | 13 | October 26, 2018 05:58 |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 05:21 |
particle, parcel and mass flow rate balance | flybird | FLUENT | 0 | May 24, 2007 10:44 |
How to change from mass flow to volume flow rate | stanley | FLUENT | 1 | February 2, 2007 06:44 |