|
[Sponsors] |
High %SD-Sur Values @ I-Radiation Full Spectrum |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 24, 2016, 11:05 |
High %SD-Sur Values @ I-Radiation Full Spectrum
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 10 |
Hey Folks,
I am doing a simulation of an solar-absorber, which seems to calculate very well. But I have problems with very high %SD-Sur values in th I-Radiation Full Spectrum (as u can see in the pictures), and I don't really have a clue how to fix it. The values fluctuate from 59% up to 100%. My Model is very simple. Just a pipe with solar radiation from the outside. So I hope somebody of you have any hints to lower that %SD-Sur values. thanks an best regards volleyHC |
|
June 24, 2016, 11:31 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,788
Rep Power: 31 |
One question, how many histories are you using ? How much does the SD% changes, if you increase the number of histories by a factor of say 10?
Also, you can plot the Wall Irradiation Heat Flux.Normalized Std Deviation on the boundaries of your domain. On such plot, you may find the areas where the standard deviation is high, and decide if the sampling in that region is critical for your simulation. |
|
June 24, 2016, 12:22 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 10 |
I am doing 2,500,000 Histories at the moment. I did 1,000,000 before, but it didnt chang very much. I could try 10,000,000 but that would increase my calculation time too much I guess - but mabye it's the only way.
I looked up the Heat Flux.Normalized Std Deviation . And it looks like this: Wall_Irradiation Flux_normStdDev_laengs.png Wall_Irradiation Flux_normStdDev_quer.png Well, I just refined my mesh very much, start my calculation again and got this message: Code:
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | ****** Notice ****** | | Spectral band contribution to the spectrum is negligible | | Domain : Default Domain | | Spectral Band: Vis | | Contribution : 0.60135-153 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | ****** Notice ****** | | Spectral band contribution to the spectrum is negligible | | Domain : Default Domain | | Spectral Band: UV | | Contribution : 0.60135-153 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | ****** Notice ****** | | Spectral band contribution to the spectrum is negligible | | Domain : Default Domain | | Spectral Band: NIR | | Contribution : 0.60135-153 | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ Last edited by volleyHC; June 25, 2016 at 05:49. |
|
July 24, 2016, 14:03 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 10 |
Does anyone has some hints/clues for me, to fix that problem?
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GETVAR Error in Multiband Monte Carlo Radiation Simulation with Directional Source | silvan | CFX | 3 | June 16, 2014 10:49 |
High Values of Cl,Cd,Cm | taimoor | FLUENT | 1 | February 4, 2009 03:00 |
RMS values too high! | Usman | Main CFD Forum | 12 | February 7, 2008 12:43 |
RMS values too high! | Usman | CFX | 1 | January 22, 2008 17:53 |
Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 06:12 |