|
[Sponsors] |
August 24, 2016, 12:19 |
Grid convergence
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 160
Rep Power: 11 |
Is it fair to limite the residual level, for exemple RMS 10^-5, and to limite the minimun number of iteration too when we do a grid convergence ? This is required for the stabilite of certain quantities of interest when the residual level doesn't really drop. However, the simulations are stopped at different residual levels, so I wonder if I can compare the results following this methodology ?
Or, should I do the grid convergence with only the residual level as stop criteria, compare the results although not all quantities of interest aren't stable. And only then, to vary the minimum number of iteration ? Thank you for your help ! |
|
August 24, 2016, 20:03 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,697
Rep Power: 143 |
If you can see the results are converged with the parameters of interest to you then I would accept looser residuals convergence.
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grid Convergence Study in Cold Plasma Jet | Mourousias | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 9, 2016 14:14 |
higher grid resolution --> later convergence? | cfd-noob89 | Main CFD Forum | 4 | October 31, 2013 09:47 |
Grid size, convergence issues | franzdrs | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 18, 2009 07:57 |
Re: Convergence problem for refined grid | CFD_Novice | Main CFD Forum | 13 | February 17, 2008 22:56 |
Convergence on non-uniform grid | dragon | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 31, 2005 02:23 |