|
[Sponsors] |
January 24, 2017, 23:27 |
NURBS surfaces on a wing
|
#1 |
Member
Ferruccio Rossi
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Melbourne, FL USA
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi all,
I am meshing an airplane wing inside an enclosure. Both pictures show only the wing surfaces inside the enclosure (the enclosure faces have been hidden). I am using two different modeling methods: METHOD 1: import 3D curves of the airfoils and obtain the wing with few surfaces (pic 1) METHOD 2: import coordinate points and obtain the wing out of many surfaces (pic 2) As you can see from the pictures, METHOD 1 is clearly preferable to work with, but when I open the mesher it says "The following faces have high order NURBS surfaces. These may take longer to mesh" And the mesh takes forever! On the other hand, if I use method 2 the mesh takes a normal amount of time. Any idea on how to solve the problem? I would prefer to work with METHOD 1 since there are only a few surfaces on the wing compared to the hundreds of surfaces of METHOD 2. Thank you for your help. |
|
January 25, 2017, 06:22 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,826
Rep Power: 144 |
Try importing the solid geometry with a different solid model format. Parasolid is often the best one, but if that does not work try STEP, ACIS or IGES.
|
|
January 25, 2017, 17:09 |
|
#3 |
Member
Ferruccio Rossi
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Melbourne, FL USA
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 10 |
Ghorrocks,
Thank you for you answer. But I modeled the wing into Design Modeler. As you can see from the picture, the wing is inside a fluid domain but it has been removed using a Boolean operation. So what is left is just the hole left by the wing inside the fluid. Following your suggestion, I exported my wing as a Parasolid file and then I imported it again as a Parasolid file and remade the enclosure around it, but it still generates NURBS when I open the mesher. Any ideas? I am stuck since it takes forever even to generate the simplest mesh without any modification. And which format is better between Parasolid text and Parasolid binary? Best regards. Last edited by frossi; January 25, 2017 at 19:22. |
|
January 26, 2017, 00:31 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,826
Rep Power: 144 |
There is no difference between parasols text and binary files, other than the obvious. The solid model data is the same.
If you are getting these problems with a design modern geometry than no import/export is required. It shows something is likely to be wacky in the way you drew the geometry. |
|
January 26, 2017, 01:36 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
urosgrivc
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Slovenija
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 11 |
What about geometry simplification...
https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Ans...BodyOpSimplify I had same problems and it worked, just make sure it doesent change the geometry too much, it usualy doesent. |
|
February 5, 2017, 15:27 |
|
#6 |
Member
Ferruccio Rossi
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Melbourne, FL USA
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 10 |
thank you for the hint urosgrivc, but is still doesn't work
Although I selected Simplify, the geometry still generated NURBS when I imported it into the mesher. So I had to use my METHOD 2 (wing with many surfaces) and there were no more NURBS. Still, thank you for the suggestion, I learned something new |
|
Tags |
cfx, flow, mesh, nurbs, wing |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ffd_control_point_2d | feiyi | SU2 | 4 | September 30, 2019 12:42 |
The following faces are higher order NURBS with many knots. These types of surfaces m | waleed | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 3 | November 16, 2018 13:47 |
Wing FSI simulation: Shell elements or 3D solid body? | frossi | CFX | 3 | June 15, 2016 20:02 |
[DesignModeler] Thin Surfaces or 3D solid model? | frossi | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | June 14, 2016 18:11 |
Using the wing mesher | GavinB | STAR-CCM+ | 1 | November 20, 2015 01:14 |