CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

high rayleigh number flow

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 30, 2001, 07:34
Default high rayleigh number flow
  #1
toni
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear All -

I'm trying to simulate 2-D convection of water in a large geometry (30m width, 6 m depth) with CFX5. Rayleigh number is quite high due to the geometry and I was wondering if anyone has experience solving such kind of flows?

Cheers,

Toni
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 31, 2001, 00:54
Default Re: high rayleigh number flow
  #2
Dan Williams
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Natural convection problems are quite interesting in that for very large Rayleigh numbers the solution tends to be transient and it is difficult to get a converged steady state solution. Don't be surprised if you run into this. Start with a relatively low Rayleigh number, say 1000 or so, and ramp it up from there.

You will probably also find that solutions at high Rayliegh numbers are very grid and numerics dependent as well. i.e., as you refine the grid the solution will keep changing because you simply keep resolving more unstable frequencies.

Dan.

  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High speed compressible flow through pipe Munni Main CFD Forum 6 December 7, 2015 11:33
Problem with Convergence at high flow rates Syed Siemens 1 April 10, 2007 15:18
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 05:12
Flow solutions over airfoils at high aoa UYGUN CFX 0 October 8, 2002 15:23
High Reynolds Number Incompressible Flow Nick Lavery Main CFD Forum 3 February 19, 2002 15:47


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:26.