|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 584
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Hi Guys,
In my model I have domains, sub-domains, initializations, interfaces and equations. I have been using domains by providing Energy values (W/m3) in Sub-domains and solving my model. Is it possible to give fixed value of temperature(K) to sub-domains? so rather than calculating the temperature distribution in sub-domain based on losses, it just knows what the temperature will be of that particular sub-domain? The only option it gives under Sources is Energy and cant choose any other equation sources. Thanks for help in advance Cheers KAPI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,011
Rep Power: 146 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Use a source term to pull the temperature to a determined value. Here's how: constant temperature heat source in subdomain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 584
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Hi Glenn,
I am trying to find the tutorial/example in documentation you mentioned but not yet successful. I read your comment but in my situation I have 500+ sub-domains and its not feasible to use equations for all of them unless I can create a table and somehow access it in each sub-domain. Cheers Kapi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 584
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
I figured rather than creating sub-domains and giving equation for fixed temperature, I can just create boundary and give fixed temperature to wall/symmetry for each body.
Hope it helps someone Cheers KAPI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,011
Rep Power: 146 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Modelling 500+ separate thermal areas is rarely a good idea. If you have so many then you should consider:
* a reduced order model, * combining regions into a small number of representative averages covering a number of individual sources * Modelling a single region and extrapolating that to the rest * Many other methods exist depending on the exact model you are attempting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 584
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
got no option Glenn sadly, Need to see thermal effect on each and every part because of the behavior of bodies.
I have tried everything you mentioned but the accuracy is reduced which is big No for my modelling. Have around 100 odd sub-domains in each domain (max of 5 domains), Normally I give losses in each sub-domain to see the thermal effect but I need to check the model with fixed temperature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,011
Rep Power: 146 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Can you explain what you are modelling and what you are trying to learn?
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [OpenFOAM.org] Patches to compile OpenFOAM 2.2 on Mac OS X | gschaider | OpenFOAM Installation | 136 | October 10, 2017 18:25 |
| Out File does not show Imbalance in % | Mmaragann | CFX | 5 | January 20, 2017 11:20 |
| what is swap4foam ?? | AB08 | OpenFOAM | 28 | February 2, 2016 02:22 |
| pisoFoam compiling error with OF 1.7.1 on MAC OSX | Greg Givogue | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 3 | March 4, 2011 18:18 |
| UDF Scalar Code: HT 1 | Greg Perkins | FLUENT | 8 | October 20, 2000 13:40 |