# Simulation of H2/air mixture in a tube

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 April 27, 2017, 02:38 Simulation of H2/air mixture in a tube #1 New Member   marharyta Join Date: Apr 2017 Posts: 5 Rep Power: 2 Hi! Now I am working on a simulation of H2/air mixture in a tube. I read that suitable for this task is a model Finite rate chemistry. Ignition model using the expression: x1=0[m] y1=0[m] z1=0[m] T1=1000[K]*(if(abs(Z-z1)<0.01[m],1,0)*if(abs(Y-y1)<0.01[m],1,0)*if(abs(X-x1)<0.01[m],1,0))+273[K]*(1-if(abs(Z-z1)<0.01[m],1,0)*if(abs(Y-y1)<0.01[m],1,0)*if(abs(X-x1)<0.01[m],1,0)), and use this temperature in domaine initialization. But the results of calculations are non-physical. Maybe, somebodycould send me a similar case for reference? I am a freshhand. Any suggestions will be appreciated! Thanks!

 April 27, 2017, 07:22 #2 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 13,738 Rep Power: 106 If the results are non-physical that suggests your ignition model is non-physical. I would have thought a constant fixed temperature of 1000K in a small region which then jumps to a constant temperature of 273K would be a pretty poor model of an actual ignition source.

April 27, 2017, 07:33
#3
New Member

marharyta
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 2
Quote:
 Originally Posted by ghorrocks If the results are non-physical that suggests your ignition model is non-physical. I would have thought a constant fixed temperature of 1000K in a small region which then jumps to a constant temperature of 273K would be a pretty poor model of an actual ignition source.
How then to simulate the stoker of ignition? Do you have some recommendations?

 April 27, 2017, 07:40 #4 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 13,738 Rep Power: 106 What is your ignition source? A spark? A pilot flame? A high temperature source?

April 27, 2017, 07:44
#5
New Member

marharyta
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 2
Quote:
 Originally Posted by ghorrocks What is your ignition source? A spark? A pilot flame? A high temperature source?
In real case it is a spark.

 April 27, 2017, 07:59 #6 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 13,738 Rep Power: 106 Sparks are usually a known amount of energy in a very small volume. So use a small source region and apply the spark energy as a heat source (probably as Watts). Note that you often have to give numerical models of combustion a bit more of a kick to get them started than you do real combustion. So you might need to give it a bit of extra energy to start if off.

April 27, 2017, 08:09
#7
New Member

marharyta
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 2
Quote:
 Originally Posted by ghorrocks Sparks are usually a known amount of energy in a very small volume. So use a small source region and apply the spark energy as a heat source (probably as Watts). Note that you often have to give numerical models of combustion a bit more of a kick to get them started than you do real combustion. So you might need to give it a bit of extra energy to start if off.
Thank you, I will try to do this using an energy source.
If I will have some question, can I write you directly?

 April 27, 2017, 18:10 #8 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 13,738 Rep Power: 106 I do not answer CFD questions by PM. Post them on the forum.

 April 27, 2017, 22:38 #9 Senior Member   Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 679 Rep Power: 15 Why are the results non-physical ? The gases do not react ? or the maximum temperature is higher than expected ? If the latter one, you should be able to compute the adiabatic temperature for a mixture of H2, N2, O2 to verify the maximum temperature. Be careful with reading reported adiabatic temperatures w/o inspecting which species are present in the mixture. Any additional information might help those in the forum to help you.

 May 11, 2017, 10:01 #10 New Member   marharyta Join Date: Apr 2017 Posts: 5 Rep Power: 2 Now I understand that the use of models Finite rate chemistry not allow me to evaluate the rate of spread of flame. So, for my task is only acceptable model of Burning Velocity Model (BVM). In the setting of the model BVM are correlations Zimont, Peters and Mueller. What correlation must be used in my task?

 Tags combastion, h2/air

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post wjbvg5 ANSYS 0 January 9, 2017 17:57 MHS78 CFD Freelancers 0 July 28, 2016 07:12 mallikarjuna FLUENT 0 April 9, 2014 23:57 gauravsharma2080 FLUENT 0 September 20, 2012 14:43 xulixian OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 April 14, 2009 15:00

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:55.