CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

nanoparticles simulation in cfx

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By ghorrocks
  • 1 Post By ghorrocks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 29, 2017, 13:40
Default nanoparticles simulation in cfx
  #1
New Member
 
Amr Mostafa
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 12
Umro mostafa is on a distinguished road
Hi guys
i am working on nanofluid jet impingement simulation
nanofluid mean
water+nanoparticles
i did a simulation considering the nanofluid as a single phase flow
i get some good results
but for more accurate and reality results iwnat to consider two phases flow
i ve to question

1- if gravity must be taken into account in this case ?
when i activate the bouyancy model , the residuals cant get convergence
2-which model aprropriate in this case ?
the geometry with BCs is attached here
thanks
Attached Images
File Type: png Screenshot_2.png (90.4 KB, 23 views)
File Type: png Screenshot_3.png (123.4 KB, 19 views)
Umro mostafa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 30, 2017, 20:07
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
A multiphase model does not sound appropriate for nanoparticles. The models in multiphase models are based on interphase drag. That is not really applicable at the nanoparticle level. Effects such as Brownian motion are more important, and CFX does not have a model for that in the multiphase model.

If the nanoparticles can be modelled as a diffusion effect then multicomponent or even a simple additional variable approach may be adequate.

But overall, CFX does not have the physics to do nanoparticle modelling so it is likely you will not be able to model it on CFX.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 1, 2017, 02:28
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Amr Mostafa
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 12
Umro mostafa is on a distinguished road
thanks alot sir for your comment
i tried to use Fluent but i get no convergence and when using the CFX for the same mesh i get convergence easily so that i prefer the CFX , i think cfx is more stable than Fluent
please tell me about (((paticle transport solid ))) model in cfx is it not suitable also ?
in the tutorial this model is used to simulate sand particles in water flow in pipes
Umro mostafa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 1, 2017, 02:34
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Please read up about multiphase CFD models. For instance the introduction of the CFX documentation on multiphase models explains this carefully.

Multiphase models are for use where the phases are mixed on the micro-scale. On this scale there is interphase slip leading to interfacial drag forces. Nano-particles are mixed at the nano-scale, there is no interphase slip due to drag forces but there is a whole bunch of new forces - Brownian motion, interfacial chemistry, Van der Waal forces etc. It is not recommended to use a multiphase model to model nano particles as it models different physics.
Umro mostafa likes this.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 1, 2017, 02:59
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Amr Mostafa
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 12
Umro mostafa is on a distinguished road
Ok i get it
but if the multiphases models in FLUENT is differ from these in CFX ?
cause papers in literature were used multiphases models in FLUENT to simulate the nanofluid
Thanks
Umro mostafa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 1, 2017, 08:20
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Have a look into how appropriate a choice they made then. Just because it is published does not mean it is correct. I have explained why it is a problem so consider the issues I discussed.
Umro mostafa likes this.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cfx les simulation start fatal error !! AS_Aero CFX 2 March 27, 2017 09:21
How to test different inlet velocities in the same CFX simulation? frossi CFX 6 June 15, 2016 12:01
Blast simulation with ANSYS CFX or FLOW-3D etc. xji ANSYS 0 November 30, 2012 16:57
CFX vs FLUENT for particle tracking simulation iman ANSYS 2 August 31, 2012 20:34
2D simulation - ICEM meshing for CFX question Ben Makhal CFX 5 April 11, 2007 08:44


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:35.