CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > CFX

Comparision of FLUENT $ CFX

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 28, 2002, 03:58
Default Comparision of FLUENT $ CFX
Congli Cheng
Posts: n/a
Hello Friends,

I am going to simulate a liquid-gas-solid three phase system where some chemical reactions are occuring, could anyone please tell me which software is more suitable between Fluent and CFX? Many thanks.

  Reply With Quote

Old   August 30, 2002, 03:01
Default Re: Comparision of FLUENT $ CFX
Posts: n/a
Hi there

You are very brave to attempt CFD of liquid-gas-solid three phase systems, with chemical reactions. This is an area of active research.

Any of the 2 codes (and many others) will give you what you reasonable results, but you will need much experience with the code itself and solid knowledge of all the physics. It will be more important to evaluate the cost of good support/guidance, and you might consider using a consultant to get the job done.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 15, 2002, 23:06
Default Re: Comparision of FLUENT $ CFX
Greg Perkins
Posts: n/a
Well I don't know about CFX but you'll have problems doing this in Fluent with any ease!

You might get this working in the old Fluent 4 if you write user code for the interphase chemical reactions. Homogeneneous reactions don't need user code.

The current Fluent 6 version can't model heat transfer or chemical reactions with dense phase solids (granular model). That should be coming soon - but how good? who knows!? So you'd have to use the langrangian methods for chemical reactions etc. which may not be suitable.

You'll need to be careful with all this stuff - even if the models exist they may not work too well together.

The older structured codes seem to have more physics than the new unstructured versions and even though the new ones have lots of other features (for geometry and paralleizaton etc) in many cases the older codes are more reliable, they are just a lot slower.


  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mesh and Solve Times for CFX, Fluent, CD-adapco Jade M Main CFD Forum 4 August 28, 2012 02:54
High Resolution (CFX) vs 2nd Order Upwind (Fluent) gravis ANSYS 3 March 24, 2011 03:43
Wall function formulation in CFX and Fluent gravis ANSYS 0 May 4, 2010 11:03
Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure Omer CFX 9 June 28, 2007 04:13
Reynolds Stress Model in Fluent Vs CFX Tim FLUENT 0 December 6, 2005 23:03

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:40.