 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
November 9, 2002, 03:58
|
Specification of both laminar and turbulent
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Laminar for gas phase while tubulent for liquid phase. But whent I write definition file, there is a wrong about inconsistence in physics option. Could anyone please tell me to how to specify it? Thanks.
David |
|
|
||
|
November 9, 2002, 06:37
|
Re: Specification of both laminar and turbulent
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
And I think it is right. What is recommended in the manual is zero eqn model for the bubble and two-eqn model for the continuous phase. Everything I say I believe to be in the manual p. 426!!! In the section "Modelling advice for multiphase flow".
|
|
|
|
||
|
November 9, 2002, 19:42
|
Re: Specification of both laminar and turbulent
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Holidays
Thanks, Holidays. In fact I have already read that section you advised. So you mean I'd better use combination of zero equation-two equation rather than that of laminar-two equation? But the Re of gas phase is very low, so what should I do? Regards David |
|
|
|
||
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CFX Treatment of Laminar and Turbulent Flows | Jade M | CFX | 18 | September 15, 2022 07:08 |
| Laminar vs Turbulent Navier-Stokes | truman | Main CFD Forum | 8 | July 10, 2017 07:20 |
| Laminar doesn't converge; Turbulent models do? | Amit | FLUENT | 11 | April 23, 2015 22:55 |
| SimpleFoam: Laminar vs. Turbulent Convergence | JasonG | OpenFOAM | 0 | June 2, 2011 08:29 |
| Half laminar and turbulent model trying to solve | Andrew Clarke | FLUENT | 5 | May 19, 2008 13:40 |
Linear Mode
