# Qs on symmetry of flow field, conducting solid

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 November 11, 2002, 12:06 Qs on symmetry of flow field, conducting solid #1 boji Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links hello there, I'm modelling a gas combustion furnace, a horizontal cylinder with a burner in one end in the center, and outlet in another end. And I'm using CFX 5.5.1. Q1, I found the flow field is not symmetric. Is there anyone else experienced the similar phenomena? What can I do to improve/correct this? (I'm not going to use a 2D simulation.) Q2, If I consider a conducting solid (Fireclay) around the furnace, heat transfer coefficient BC. With a small timescale for "energy" equations, it would converge with a wrong T field. While if I apply a larger timescale (e.g. 10s), the convergence is very slow. I played around with "Solid time scale factor" etc., there was little help. Could anybody give me some suggestions on this? Thanks in advance. bo

 November 11, 2002, 18:08 Re: Qs on symmetry of flow field, conducting solid #2 Astrid Guest   Posts: n/a Q1. When you unstructured grid is not symmetric, your solution will not be completely symmetric. Q2. Have you tried to run with only the energy equation while using a huge timestep? Astrid

 November 12, 2002, 08:05 Re: Qs on symmetry of flow field, conducting solid #3 boji Guest   Posts: n/a Thank you. I thought solving a heat conduction problem would be fast. The calculation is running now with 60s for energy equations and 1s for the others. The RMS for energy in solid is about 2.3*10^-4 and converging very slow (rate=0.99 or even 1.00). Energy imbalance is about 50% in the solid area but decreasing slowly. Any more suggestions? I found out that you also attended the conference in Strasbourg, in an earlier post. Do you have any news of the CD? Best regards bo

 November 12, 2002, 15:17 Re: Qs on symmetry of flow field, conducting solid #4 Neale Guest   Posts: n/a Run with an even higher timestep on the energy equation, like 1.0E20. If the heat transfer is diffusion dominated it may take quite some time to converge with a small timestep. Also, what is the Prantdl number for your fluid? If the thermal boundary layer is much thicker than the hydrodynamic (i.e. Pr>>1) then you will have to use quite large energy timesteps. If the fluids equations are solved well enough then you might also try turning them off with the "solve fluids =f" (maybe also solve tke eps=f) expert parameter and then just solve the energy equation with that large timestep. As far as the symmetry of the flow field goes, how were you ensuring this? Did you use symmetry boundary conditions? If not, then symmetry is not guaranteed. Neale

 November 12, 2002, 18:31 Re: Qs on symmetry of flow field, conducting solid #5 Astrid Guest   Posts: n/a No news of the CD. Ask the helpdesk. Astrid

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Josh CFX 4 July 9, 2010 16:52 Michiel CFX 17 April 21, 2010 10:14 Rogerio Fernandes Brito CFX 0 March 18, 2008 18:20 KK CFX 5 February 14, 2008 17:48 diaw Main CFD Forum 104 February 16, 2006 06:44