# Potential Flow

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 24, 2003, 20:01 Potential Flow #1 Swapnil Guest   Posts: n/a Hi all, I am working on an academic problem of potential flow through venturimeter type geometry. For defining potential flow i need to specify viscosity=0 and no slip boundary condition. I created a modified fluid with all properties of water except viscosity=10^-10 (to specify viscosity close to zero) and i used free slip boundary condition at walls and k-omega turbulence model. Upto 30 iterations the solver was working fine with a convergence rate close to 0.98. But after that the convergence rate is close to 1(most of the time above 1) and now circulating flow is developed (indicated by the "wall placed" in solver ) and after 77 iterations 42% area is covered with walls to prevent inflow. If the fluid would have not been potential flow, a recirculation zone is expected in the venturimeter type (contracting-expanding) geometry. But, potential flow should not show any recirculation. Why i am getting recirculation, even though i have defined the fluid close to potential flow? And why the recirculation started showing after 30 iterations. Please let me know. Regards, Swapnil

 February 25, 2003, 17:26 Re: Potential Flow #2 Glenn Horrocks Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Swapnil, If you are trying to model potential flow you should not use a turbulence model, that is run a laminar flow simulation with almost zero (eg 10^-10) viscosity. Also use slip wall boundaries. Glenn

 February 25, 2003, 19:32 Re: Potential Flow #3 Swapnil Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Glenn, since the viscosity is very low (10^-10), the Reynolds no is of the order of 10^13 and if i use the laminar flow model it gave me error that Re number is out of range. That's why i used turbulence model. Then the solver didn't give the Re no. error.

 February 26, 2003, 04:32 Re: Potential Flow #4 Bart Prast Guest   Posts: n/a Ignore the error message. It is just a warning that considering your Re number you are in the turbulent region. If you are not going to solve the boundary layer then do use laminar.

 February 26, 2003, 04:39 Re: Potential Flow #5 Bob Guest   Posts: n/a Bart, what would happen if you just turned the turbulence equations off using the expert paramerters ? Bob

 February 26, 2003, 08:33 Re: Potential Flow #6 Bart Prast Guest   Posts: n/a Don't know actually. Propably the same as laminair. But it's easy to test. Just try it both ways and let me know the difference. You know, you can also post this on the CFX forum at the CFX site. It's just started and works great (for me)

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Ruben Main CFD Forum 43 May 7, 2011 03:32 Atit CFX 0 May 3, 2006 10:05 karthik FLUENT 0 July 7, 2005 06:14 Axel Rohde Main CFD Forum 1 November 19, 2001 13:19 Adrin Gharakhani Main CFD Forum 9 March 12, 1999 12:32

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45.