CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > CFX

Initiation of expansion wave

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 26, 2003, 03:57
Default Initiation of expansion wave
I Clifford
Posts: n/a
I am trying to simulate a shock tube problem on either CFX or Star-CD, to study the interactions of the expansion wave with various obstacles. I don't, however, know how to approach setting up such a problem on these packages. I do know that ideally I need an outlet where I can set flow conditions (Temperature, pressure, velocities, etc.) and an inlet that will initially have set conditions but must not reflect any waves passing it. I would appreciate any suggestions on how to achieve this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2003, 04:30
Default Re: Initiation of expansion wave
Bart Prast
Posts: n/a
I'm not sure but I think that these codes do not have non-reflecting (based on characteristics/Rieman invariants) boundary conditions implemented. It is quite difficult to do this in 3D and make it robust. But anyone can correct me if I'm wrong. I would be interrested in (commercial) codes which do have this capability.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2003, 16:15
Default Re: Initiation of expansion wave
Posts: n/a

Just some comments:

- The classic shock tube problem has no inlets or outlets. It's just a box.

- At an outlet you can only set one flow condition, otherwise the problem will be overconstrained. I think you mean you want to set the inlet flow conditions instead.

- No "open" (inlet or outlet) boundary condition in the world will perfectly transmit shock waves (i.e. large amplitude acoustics). Even properly implemented non-reflecting conditions only work on weak acoustic waves. See papers on this by Thompson in JCP (mid 80s).

- You can easily setup a "classic" shock tube in CFX-5. Run it transient and use the CEL setup function to create two independent regions with differing pressure/temperature/density at whatever ratios you decide. Make sure you pick a timestep that will adequately resolve the shock propagation speed. i.e. the shock travels no more than a few cells per timestep, otherwise you will get severe diffusive effects.

- Run these calculations in CFX-5 with the High Resolution advection scheme. If you are not satisfied with the "sharpness" you can play with the parameter "Maximum Blend Factor" (at the expense of some non-monotone wiggles). The default is 1, and maximum is 2.


  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Scaling up a wave energy converter - free surface flow mark_l CFX 3 February 17, 2010 17:57
Difference between shock and expansion wave? jinwon park Main CFD Forum 2 May 6, 2008 04:06
prandtl-meyer expansion wave anderson's Main CFD Forum 1 January 6, 2004 06:25
Prandtl-Meyer Expansion Wave Maciej Matyka Main CFD Forum 0 March 13, 2003 20:55
Initiation of expansion wave I Clifford Siemens 0 February 26, 2003 03:58

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:48.