CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Defined inlet velocity is different with inlet velocity on CFX post

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 2, 2017, 06:52
Thumbs down Defined inlet velocity is different with inlet velocity on CFX post
  #1
New Member
 
Jonathan
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
jonpewpew is on a distinguished road
Hi there,

I'm new to CFD, and I got problems with CFX post as I don't get my expected results.

My project is simulating flow over a FSAE car to obtain drag and down force.I made the boundary with enclosure on DesignModeller.
I specified inlet velocity as 60 km/h, after the simulation finished I checked the velocity at the inlet using function calculator> sum> velocity, which shows 2150 m/s.

How could this happened as I specified a constant speed at inlet?

Thank you
jonpewpew is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2017, 07:37
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
urosgrivc
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Slovenija
Posts: 365
Rep Power: 11
urosgrivc is on a distinguished road
Hi

Why did you use sum? use >area average>velocity
what does velocity contour look like if you make a plane, does it look like 60, or something else at an inlet?

It is almost never the softwares fault, its just a computer it doesent know enithig, the person who uses it gives it all the data and guidance.
When I first started using cfx I was the same, blame it on the cfx, now I know that I just ditnt know ewerithing and I still dont know a lot but I know that if something is wrong it is most probably my fault and not the number crunching machine. This is some life advice that can be implemented in a lot of other cases asveal

I was a FSAE car designer for about 4 years, so I realy hope you make it work and get some good results.

I suggest you use monitor points for drag and downforce and let your convergence criteria be primarely based on these monitor points and not just residuals.

Last edited by urosgrivc; November 2, 2017 at 08:52.
urosgrivc is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2017, 16:40
Default
  #3
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
The sum function does just that, it sums. So if you have 500 nodes each at 4m/s it will sum to 2000m/s. This is a pretty useless calculation and I suspect it is not what you wanted.

I think you are looking for averaging functions. areaAve or massflowAve look like better choices to me.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cfx, cfx post


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VELOCITY vs VELOCITY IN STN FRAME vs RELATIVE VELOCITY everest20 FLUENT 1 July 13, 2015 08:35
Velocity in porous domain in CFX post Chander CFX 5 May 20, 2015 04:12
velocity inlet and ideal gas simultaneously-what's wrong? preetam69 FLUENT 0 September 28, 2013 04:51
Velocity inlet boundary condition for porous medium Chander CFX 3 March 11, 2012 21:18
VOF Volume fraction in Velocity inlet aruelle FLUENT 1 March 18, 2010 11:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31.