# Mass flow rate specification

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 March 27, 2003, 09:23 Mass flow rate specification #1 Deborah Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links Hi all! My geometry consists in a duct with inlet and outlet boudaries acting as periodic pair. In order to define the mass flow rate, I have create a sub-domain (which is the entire domain).For the source term I have the choice between "momentum", "mass source",... but not "mass flow rate". How can I do? Thanks in advance. Deborah

 March 28, 2003, 11:48 Re: Mass flow rate specification #2 Martin Bowers Guest   Posts: n/a Long way: Figure out what the correction distribution of momentum sources is to create the fully developed flow field I'm assuming you're looking for. For a straight pipe it's constant, anything else: probably not. You will have to find some way to iterate on the average value until you get the right mass flow rate. Short way: Buy Fluent and just specify mass flow rate. Future way: Maybe CFX will implement a periodic mass flow rate BC.

 March 30, 2003, 18:28 Re: Mass flow rate specification #3 Glenn Horrocks Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Martin, I think CFX4 has this type of boundary condition you describe. There is no need to go across to the dark side. Hopefully CFX5 will implement this type of BC in a future release. Regards, Glenn Horrocks

 April 1, 2003, 02:00 Re: Mass flow rate specification #4 Neale Guest   Posts: n/a This is certainly a non-trivial boundary condition to robustly implement in a coupled-implicit solver. You could use a static pressure inlet and mass outlet, set the timestep small enough, and hope to hell things "hold on". It might work OK for an incompressible flow. Neale.

 April 1, 2003, 13:59 Re: Mass flow rate specification #5 Martin Bowers Guest   Posts: n/a Well I can appreciate that the BC might not be as easy to implement into a coupled implicit solver, but I haven't seen any justification as to why exactly. If the implementation is just a matter of balancing a global source term against the desired mass flow rate, why does the user have to do that tedious iterative work when the code doesn't? - It is an iterative solver after all!

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post tejasvikrishna FLUENT 2 May 25, 2013 02:42 sepidecent CFX 0 August 9, 2011 00:15 leonozx FLUENT 2 April 29, 2011 09:19 destgir448 CFX 5 December 11, 2010 06:55 Masood FLUENT 0 May 22, 2005 00:32