CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

initialization of pressure in bubble column modeling

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 12, 2017, 03:38
Question initialization of pressure in bubble column modeling
  #1
Member
 
Roy
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 8
ROY4 is on a distinguished road
Hello,
I'm modeling a bubble column using CFX and for boundary conditions in outlet I set degassing and for inlet I have a wall that source points are defined on it to inject air in to the domain. I solved it and I found the mass conservation correct. and the results were some how near to the experimental data. But now I have two really serious problems that I feel they might make my solution completely wrong.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1) For modeling, I did not set initial conditions and volume fractions. Instead I used the steady state solution(which in there no volume fractions was set either) as my initial guess. Can this make my solution wrong?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2) I want to get data about the pressure of the gas in outlet but the pressure that it gives to me is about 600 pa which is not correct, the air is entering the domain at 1 atm. the degassing boundary gives 600 pa and it can not be specified for every fluid separately...that is not true because then the flow does not exit the domain. I thought maybe Im getting the degassing boundary meaning wrong. In CFX-Pre I didn't specify any thing for the pressure. Now I feel that this makes my solution wrong. please if some one know any thing about the pressure definition in CFX, answer my question that: should I define some expression for pressure before defining my run to get the true results?
or maybe my settings are all wrong from the first place?

I appreciate your helps in advance

thank you
ROY4 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 12, 2017, 17:08
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
1) If the initial condition is important then yes, it could be significant. It sounds like what you did was equivalent to having a water tank with no bubbles then turning the air on. If this is a reasonable approximation of the actual situation then your initial condition sounds fine.

2) The variable pressure is relative to the reference pressure. And for buoyant simulations there is an additional factor because the pressure is relative to a hydrostatic pressure obtained from the buoyancy reference density and location. Read the documentation about the pressure variable for more details.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 13, 2017, 12:31
Default
  #3
Member
 
Roy
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 8
ROY4 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
1) If the initial condition is important then yes, it could be significant. It sounds like what you did was equivalent to having a water tank with no bubbles then turning the air on. If this is a reasonable approximation of the actual situation then your initial condition sounds fine.

2) The variable pressure is relative to the reference pressure. And for buoyant simulations there is an additional factor because the pressure is relative to a hydrostatic pressure obtained from the buoyancy reference density and location. Read the documentation about the pressure variable for more details.
Dear ghorrocks
thanks a lot for answering my question.
1)for your first answer I should say no. there is air injection via source points in steady state too. I mean that I solved the whole problem in steady state condition and did not specify a volume fraction in any place of the settings. the only thing I did was not to activate transient mode...I let it go in steady state for about 20000 steps and then I use it as an initial condition for transient flow,
now do you think this is wrong to model the unsteady two phase problem in steady state mode and then use its information as the initial guess for the transient solution?
2) can you please explain what do you mean by documentation about pressure variable? because I checked CFX tutorial and CFX guide for more explanation of pressure but it didn't give enough information. and there is not pressure contour in literature related to my case
3) by the way can you please tell me what is the difference between total pressure and pressure in CFD post? Is pressure static pressure?
because from both of them i get this result that the pressure increase with increasing height...it is leveled but it does not make sense to my knowledge
ROY4 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 13, 2017, 17:16
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
1) This approach is good, if this is representative of what you are modelling (starting a transient run from a steady state run).

2) See CFX theory manual, section 1.3, Buoyancy. Eqn 1-128 is what I am talking about.

3) Total pressure = Static Gauge Pressure + Dynamic pressure; Pressure = Static gauge pressure.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 13, 2017, 18:35
Default
  #5
Member
 
Roy
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 8
ROY4 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
1) This approach is good, if this is representative of what you are modelling (starting a transient run from a steady state run).

2) See CFX theory manual, section 1.3, Buoyancy. Eqn 1-128 is what I am talking about.

3) Total pressure = Static Gauge Pressure + Dynamic pressure; Pressure = Static gauge pressure.
Dear ghorrocks
All the best for you..Thanks a lot for your help and fast answering
But may I ask you do you think that the pressure in a bubble column must increase with height or decrease?
I ask it again to see if you have any sense about it(like any personal idea)?because as I said before I don't have.
In my knowledge as the height increases the pressure decrease...but I'm experiencing vise versa in here..pressure increase with height increasing. How is that possible?can buoyancy and turbulent flow effect this some how?
ROY4 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Operating pressure in cavitation modeling Tunlu Main CFD Forum 1 June 6, 2017 17:40
Pressure dissipation problem in bubble simulation (Riemann problem) ndabir CFX 9 June 4, 2015 16:48
Pressure dissipation problem in bubble simulation (Riemann problem) ndabir FLUENT 0 June 3, 2015 20:17
Pressure dissipation problem in bubble simulation (Riemann problem) ndabir FLUENT 0 June 3, 2015 20:16
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (long) DS & HB Main CFD Forum 0 January 8, 2000 15:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:07.