CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Boundary Condition Mass Flow Rate does not match the CFX Solver result

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 7, 2017, 12:54
Unhappy Boundary Condition Mass Flow Rate does not match the CFX Solver result
  #1
New Member
 
Vijeshravi
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 2
vijeshravi is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am trying to solve a simple Y-divider pipe problem. I have one Inlet and 2 Outlets. The Boundary Conditions that I give to the Inlet and the Outlets are Mass Flow Rate (0.02 kg/s) and the relative pressure (0Pa). The problem solves and the solution converges. When I check the Mass Flow Rate at the Inlet in the CFX result, I get a value at the inlet which is 100 times less than the actual input I give. I get 0.0002 kg/s whereas my input is 0.02 kg/s.

I tried calculating velocity based on Mass Flow Rate, Density, and Area and gave that as input. But, I still get the same wrong Inlet on the CFX result.

Please help me out what could be the possible thing that I could be doing wrong here? I tried increasing the convergence criteria, tried different gas. Nothing helped. I even forced the solver to take 1/4th of the actual inlet at one of the outlets and I get the same result.
vijeshravi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2017, 14:36
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 714
Rep Power: 13
evcelica is on a distinguished road
sounds like you are doing something wrong when you typed in the value. Hard for us to tell what the problem is.
do you have the out file? That would be good to post.
evcelica is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2017, 14:59
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Vijeshravi
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 2
vijeshravi is on a distinguished road
Hello Evcelica! Thank you so much for the reply. I have attached the CFX out file here. Please take a look at it and help me out where I am doing wrong.
I have also attached the images of the Boundary Conditions and the CFX result that I was talking about.
Attached Files
File Type: zip Fluid Flow CFX_001.zip (11.9 KB, 2 views)
File Type: zip Inlet Mass Flow Result.zip (162.1 KB, 0 views)
vijeshravi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2017, 23:47
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 14,195
Rep Power: 109
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
How are you calculating the mass flow rate in the post processor?

Your output files show you converged until the imbalances are quite small, so that says it should have converged very close to your desired flow rate.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2017, 09:10
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Vijeshravi
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 2
vijeshravi is on a distinguished road
Yes! The solution converges pretty well with high accuracy. I used the expression massFlowAve(Mass Flow)@Inlet in the CFX post processor. Also, I generated a Mass Flow Rate Contour at the Inlet to check the mass distribution.

In my previous reply, along with the CFX out I have attached the images of the result. I will reattach the same here. Am I checking the results wrong?
Attached Files
File Type: zip Inlet Mass Flow Result.zip (162.1 KB, 0 views)
vijeshravi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 8, 2017, 09:48
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Lance
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 622
Rep Power: 15
Lance is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vijeshravi View Post
I used the expression massFlowAve(Mass Flow)@Inlet in the CFX post processor.
If you only want the massflow rate you should use massFlow()@Inlet instead.
Lance is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 12, 2017, 16:47
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Vijeshravi
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 2
vijeshravi is on a distinguished road
Hello Lance,

Thank you so much for the help. massFlow()@Region solved the problem. Though, one thing is confusing. I create a mass flow contour at the inlet and the value does not match the value that I get using the expression (massFlow()@Inlet). Any thought on that. I have attached the Inlet Mass Flow Contour.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Inlet mass flow contour.JPG (76.2 KB, 6 views)
vijeshravi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 13, 2017, 09:49
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 725
Rep Power: 15
Opaque is on a distinguished road
The contour of mass flow works on the mass flows on each face of the mesh (specifically integration points on the faces).

massFlow()@Inlet is the summation of all those face mass flows.

They cannot be the same.
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cfx, mass flow rate, post processor

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to transform (mass flow rate) boundary condition from 3D to 2D? nurul efha FLUENT 6 July 31, 2016 19:11
Wrong flow in ratating domain problem Sanyo CFX 17 August 15, 2015 06:20
Radiation interface hinca CFX 15 January 26, 2014 18:11
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: volo87 CFX 5 June 14, 2013 17:44
CFX mass flow boundary condition Michele Cagna CFX 3 February 22, 2007 16:52


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:34.