|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Marcello Asciolla
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Italy
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Is there a way to see what is the exact scheme for these options when I choose the numerical scheme in "equation class settings"?
-central difference -high resolution -upwind -specified blend factor Maybe it is in the documentation, but I did not found them. For istance I have an idea for some of them (I know the classical formulation for the "upwind" and the "central difference" ones, but I do not know if there are modified version), but what is the expression used for the "high resolution" or the "blend factor"? Is there a way to use a homemade scheme in CFX? Which scheme can assure the minimum numerical dissipation (I mean the artificial one)? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,945
Rep Power: 34 ![]() |
Documentation section:
CFX Solver Theory Guide/Discretization and Solution Theory/Numerical Discretization/Discretization of the Governing Equations/Advection Term There is no entry for a User Defined treatment of the advection term. Is there a particular advection scheme you would like to try? It would be great to know what such scheme advantage is? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Marcello Asciolla
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Italy
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Thank you, I will try to give a look there.
There is not a particular numerical scheme that I wanted to use, I wanted to know if there is this opportunity. I need a CFD simulation with the requirement of little dissipation because it is for aeroacoustic purpose. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,017
Rep Power: 146 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Then have a look at the central difference scheme. CFX also has a variant of central difference scheme for LES modelling - read the documentation for details.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Marcello Asciolla
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Italy
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 9 ![]() |
Yes, I was thinking about a central difference one. I do not know if there is anything better than it, for this reason I also asked for a suggestion about different schemes... And I am glad to hear that there is a different version for LES, so I must think that they already thought about that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,017
Rep Power: 146 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Low dissipation is essential for LES, so you have a few low or no dissipation options for LES models.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| cfx, equation, scheme |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Melt front artificial dissipation with VoF | steph79 | FLUENT | 0 | February 22, 2016 08:13 |
| Artificial dissipation for NS equations, flow in a pipe | RameshK | Main CFD Forum | 8 | November 13, 2011 11:29 |
| numerical scheme without artificial diffusion artifact | mpeti | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | October 26, 2011 12:36 |
| Two questions on Numerical schemes for NS equations | RameshK | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 21, 2010 08:46 |
| Standard for checking and testing numerical schemes? | X. Ye | Main CFD Forum | 7 | August 31, 1999 18:05 |