# WHICH SOLUTION TO BELIEVE ?

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
 August 10, 2004, 20:05 WHICH SOLUTION TO BELIEVE ? #1 Bob Guest   Posts: n/a Greetings to everyone! My task is modelling a spiral subsonic flow inside of a cylinder that rotates around its main axis, in CFX-5.6. I am using the SSG turbulence model. The solution converges within 100 iterations gradually to the RMS residuals: U-Mom = 1.5E-4 uu-RS = 6.6E-4 mass = 9.5E-7 In CFX-Post, the flow demonstrates several swirls. Running the Solver further is resulted in steady growing of all residuals and at the iteration 620, I have: | Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | +----------------------+------+---------+---------+ | U-Mom | 0.97 | 6.9E-04 | 1.9E-02 | | V-Mom | 1.06 | 4.6E-04 | 1.0E-02 | | W-Mom | 0.89 | 5.7E-05 | 1.6E-03 | | P-Mass | 1.05 | 9.3E-06 | 2.1E-04 | +----------------------+------+---------+---------+ | uu-RS | 1.05 | 7.0E-03 | 6.5E-02 | +----------------------+------+---------+---------+ | vv-RS | 1.07 | 7.7E-03 | 7.1E-02 | +----------------------+------+---------+---------+ | ww-RS | 1.00 | 6.1E-04 | 7.9E-03 | +----------------------+------+---------+---------+ | uv-RS | 0.98 | 9.1E-03 | 8.2E-02 | +----------------------+------+---------+---------+ | uw-RS | 0.90 | 2.1E-04 | 3.6E-03 | +----------------------+------+---------+---------+ | vw-RS | 1.06 | 3.7E-04 | 9.5E-03 | +----------------------+------+---------+---------+ | E-Diss.K | 0.98 | 4.6E-04 | 1.6E-02 | There is NO SWIRLS in this solution at all ! Anyone would know which solution to believe and if I should continue iterations hoping it will finally converge?

 August 11, 2004, 19:10 Re: WHICH SOLUTION TO BELIEVE ? #2 Glenn Horrocks Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Bob, I would believe neither at this stage. If it does not converge to a credible solution then something is probably wrong with the simulation. I suspect your simulation is not fully converged, and if it is not converging nicely then either your mesh quality is poor, your timesteps are wrong, you are using an incorrect physical model or you need to try a transient simulation. Glenn

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post hjasak OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 170 March 2, 2016 05:20 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 July 22, 2007 02:58 litonx OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 February 21, 2007 02:32 CFX Begineer CFX 0 October 27, 2002 11:54 Seb Main CFD Forum 13 May 22, 2001 13:37

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:08.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top