CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Material Table Generation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 21, 2018, 02:28
Default Material Table Generation
  #1
Senior Member
 
Pedro Oliveira
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Portugal
Posts: 109
Rep Power: 8
oliveira1820 is on a distinguished road
I´m using water with IAWPS table generation values.

I notice that the maximum total pressure I obtain at the CFX-Post is the value I defined as the maximum table pressure value (350 bar). After this I increased this value and I verified again that the total pressure value obtained on the CFX-Post was again the new maximum value I have defined ( 450 bar).

What I conclude is that the maximum pressure value I use in my table generation it small compared to the real value and I have increased the value again ( 500 bar). Only that now, my simulation that runned perfectly it crashes right before the beggining of the first coeficient loop of the first iteration.

With a value higher that 450 bar, in my case, the simulation crashes, does anybody knows why or how I can solve this problem?
oliveira1820 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2018, 08:13
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,868
Rep Power: 144
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Advanced material models like IAWPS are often hard to converge. I would recommend you first do a simulation using simple, fixed material properties. This should be easy and converge quickly. The result of that will estimate what the maximum pressure you are going to get it, then you can size you table range correctly and return to IAWPS.

Assuming you still have convergence problems after this, the first things to try are the normal ones for numerical instability: double precision numerics, better mesh quality, smaller time step, better initial condition.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2018, 08:49
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Pedro Oliveira
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Portugal
Posts: 109
Rep Power: 8
oliveira1820 is on a distinguished road
I already estimated the maximum pressure as you say and its lower then the maximum I can use to get convergence. I thought that maybe I was missing something about the table generation. I´l try the mesh improvement first.

Thank you for all your help, Best Regards
oliveira1820 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Setting the height of the stream in the free channel kevinmccartin CFX 12 October 13, 2022 22:43
Domain Reference Pressure and mass flow inlet boundary AdidaKK CFX 75 August 20, 2018 06:37
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 12 March 19, 2018 06:21
error message cuteapathy CFX 14 March 20, 2012 07:45
Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue Miguel Baritto CFX 4 August 31, 2006 13:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:37.