|
[Sponsors] |
May 10, 2005, 08:45 |
thinwalls vs CFX-5
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi..I was using CFX-4 some ages ago i had a model sort of pipe in pipe system where the inner pipe was cut in the midle so i was was using thin walls boundaries to repredsent the patches in cfx-4 and that worked nice. Im trying to do this in CFX-5, when i try to define those inner walls (the faces) as walls i get the message that the faces im trying to define are not part of an external boundary . Any of you have an idea on how to define those internal walls?
Best regards |
|
May 15, 2005, 04:56 |
Re: thinwalls vs CFX-5
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
As long as there's a surface region there, it should work. There's also a toggle button in Pre which allows you to create the matching opposite face of the wall. Try that.
Jeff |
|
May 16, 2005, 03:00 |
Re: thinwalls vs CFX-5
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thanks Jeff that worked fine!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICEM] Proper way to name boundaries on 2D model for use in CFX? | RossFS | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 4 | November 10, 2011 02:38 |
Pros and Cons for CFX, CFdesign, COMSOL | Val | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 10, 2011 02:20 |
CFX pressure in Simulations problem | nasdak | CFX | 1 | April 14, 2010 13:22 |
PhD using CFX | Rui | CFX | 9 | May 28, 2007 05:59 |
CFX 4.4 installation problem | Pandu Sattvika | CFX | 1 | December 1, 2001 04:07 |