|
[Sponsors] |
August 30, 2005, 11:48 |
time step
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,there
For steady state problem, it usually need to give a large time step at beginning and then gradually reduce that. How about the time step for transient problems? Should I give a large or small number to start the solver? Can someone share your experience? Regards! Rob |
|
August 31, 2005, 18:11 |
Re: time step
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
If the problem is stiff, then it is generally recommended that you start with a small time step, due to its instability issues at the start. But as the simulation progress, you could potentially increase the time step. RK |
|
August 31, 2005, 20:08 |
Re: time step
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Robin.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HELP! time step too small? | meangreen | Main CFD Forum | 6 | May 31, 2018 10:41 |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 05:36 |
Hydrostatic Pressure and Gravity | miliante | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 132 | October 7, 2012 22:50 |
Full pipe 3D using icoFoam | cyberbrain | OpenFOAM | 4 | March 16, 2011 09:20 |
calculation diverge after continue to run | zhajingjing | OpenFOAM | 0 | April 28, 2010 04:35 |