Pressure jump too late in (laminar, turbulence free) convergent-divergent nozzle

Simser · July 19, 2019, 12:59

Hello Guys,

sorry for any mistakes, this is my first post.

For University I am trying to model a convergent-divergent nozzle with CFX (quasi 2D ICEM CFD Mesh).

For now I just want to simulate it without viscous Forces and laminar, turbulence free flow.

My boundary conditions are p_exit = 0.7bar (static pressure at outlet), p_0 = 1bar (total pressure at inlet). I assume Air ideal Gas (kappa=1.4, T_0 = 300K). The crosssections are 51mm^2 at inlet, 24mm^2 at minimal crosssection and 42.28mm^2 at Outlet.

From these I calculated the pressure drop to be at the crosssection with approx. 28.5mm^2 (see attached file "calculate_shock").
But when simulating with CFX, the shock occurs further downstream at approx. 35mm^2. (Arrow shows location where it should be)

For the simulation I used free-slip walls and symmetry conditions at the sides. Turbulence model is none. I use Total Energy Equations without viscous terms.

Has somebody a hint what I might have missed?
Or what further information do you need?

Best Regards
Simser

ghorrocks · July 19, 2019, 20:50

Before comparing your results to anything you need to check your simulation is accurate. Comparing an inaccurate simulation to anything is pointless. This FAQ has some explanation: https://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansy..._inaccurate.3F

With the key bits being you need to check your convergence criteria is tight enough and your mesh fine enough.

Simser · July 20, 2019, 05:15

Thank you for your answer, I already looked through these guidelines. I startet with coarse meshs and refined them stepwise until cells with 0.25mm width globally and then refined the location of the pressure drops further. I got max. Residuals under 10^-5 and the pressure drop was always at the same position.

But a colleague informed me today that I had a wrong assumption in my theoretical calculations and now both Simulation and Theory correlate well.

July 19, 2019, 20:50		#2
ghorrocks Super Moderator Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,701 Rep Power: 143	Before comparing your results to anything you need to check your simulation is accurate. Comparing an inaccurate simulation to anything is pointless. This FAQ has some explanation: https://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansy..._inaccurate.3F With the key bits being you need to check your convergence criteria is tight enough and your mesh fine enough. __________________ Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Supersonic free jets from CD nozzle	naveensdas	FLUENT	14	May 2, 2013 12:07
Pressure jump and momentum source	Tanya	FLUENT	1	June 4, 2009 15:22
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!!	Wen Long	Main CFD Forum	3	May 15, 2009 09:52
Neumann pressure BC and velocity field	Antech	Main CFD Forum	0	April 25, 2006 02:15
what the result is negatif pressure at inlet	chong chee nan	FLUENT	0	December 29, 2001 05:13

July 20, 2019, 05:15		#3
Simser New Member Simon Join Date: Jul 2019 Location: Germany Posts: 3 Rep Power: 6	Thank you for your answer, I already looked through these guidelines. I startet with coarse meshs and refined them stepwise until cells with 0.25mm width globally and then refined the location of the pressure drops further. I got max. Residuals under 10^-5 and the pressure drop was always at the same position. But a colleague informed me today that I had a wrong assumption in my theoretical calculations and now both Simulation and Theory correlate well.