# Flow Analysis tilting Pad thrust bearing using CFX

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
 January 7, 2006, 00:21 Flow Analysis tilting Pad thrust bearing using CFX #1 julien Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, We are trying to simulate oil flow through tilting pad thrust bearing using CFX. We are not getting the correct result as compared to theortical results. Problem statement; 1.One wall surface is rotating (Collar of shaft) 2.Bearing surface (wall) stationary but at an angle to rotating wall. 3.Gap (70 micron ) between above to wall is having boundray with pressure equal to 1 Atm abs .(we have taken opening boundry condition with 0 relative pressure keeping ref pressure as 1 atm) 4.Material property values for oil viscosity,density,specific heat are correctly put in material property. Oil inlet temp & viscosity variation with temp expression is also fed properly. Meshed fluid model satisfy all the mesh quality checks given by CFX. Model selected is : Laminar as Re < 800 Heat transfer model : total energy Convergence value: 1e05 max residual We are getting load carrying capacity by CFX less (About 40%) than theortical & Experimental results. Pls letus know and guide us where we are going wrong Regards, Julien

 January 7, 2006, 01:34 Re: Flow Analysis tilting Pad thrust bearing using #2 Bak_Flow Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Julien, I am not sure what you are using for comparison for your exprimental and theoretical result but in most lubrication problems such extreme pressures are developed in the gap...often called "Druckberg" or pressure-hill that you must make the viscocity a funtion of pressure. Under such high pressures viscosity increases significantly...increasing the load capacity for a given condition. Some of the standard refs on Hydrodynamic lubrication should have relations for viscosity as a function of pressure..... try the book by Cameron for a start. Regards, Bak_Flow

 January 7, 2006, 02:34 Re: Flow Analysis tilting Pad thrust bearing using #3 julien Guest   Posts: n/a thanks Bak_Flow, We are comparing CFX results with therotical(Based on Reynolds Equation).In both the results we have not taken viscosity variation with pressure, then why is the diffence in both the results. Also experimental results are matching with therotical (Based on Reynolds Equation). if i am correct, CFX uses navier stroke equation,and reynolds equation is derived from it. So pls let me know where are we goning wrong in CFX formulation. Regards, julien

 January 21, 2012, 05:48 Info lubrication simulation #4 New Member   Luca Gorasso Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Harbin, China Posts: 24 Rep Power: 8 Hi, I'm working as a PhD student to simulation of EHL and general lubrication problems with CFX. So, I think Reynolds equation of lubrication is generated from N-S equations. Film Thickness and load equilibrium equation is just a physical consideration so if you can implement viscosity and density models (Ree-Eyring or Roelands model for viscosity and Dowson model for density) and formulation for load equilibrium, cavitation model and FSI (fluid structure iteration to avoid the elastically deformation of the ball) I'm pretty sure that yours and mine simulations will work. I'm trying to simulate a ball sliding on a plane but at now, after some months I could not have results. For me the principal problem is that I'm not strong in simulations so write CEL expression for viscosity is not easy. I wrote the expression of the density and seams working. For the density let we make an example: let we consider Barus viscosity model: u=uo*exp(a*p), where uo [Pa*s] is the ambient pressure viscosity, a [Pa^-1] is the pressure viscosity index and p [Pa] is the pressure. After defining uo is easy to write the expression but my CFX seams not use it. Instead of p I use Pressure, but if I check at any iteration the value of dynamic viscosity I have Min=0.97*10^-3 and Max=1*10^-2 which for a gap of 10^6 Pa is not possible. May be I use the wrong variable "Pressure" or CFX don't do the iteration like I want. If you use the Herschel Buckley model already implemented in Ansys the simulation works, but I want to use my model not a prepared model! How can I do? What's wrong in my formula? For the guy who is making experiments and simulation we can talk about it by email if he want, I'm quiet strong in tribology. luca.gorasso@gmail.com

 April 9, 2014, 05:52 #5 New Member   ashish Join Date: Apr 2014 Posts: 1 Rep Power: 0 hey hi julien we have aproject on designin of thrust pad can u plz help me on this topic

 April 9, 2014, 08:38 #6 Senior Member   Bruno Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Brazil Posts: 279 Rep Power: 14 Julien's post is from 2006, when this forum worked differently. Don't expect him to answer you.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post nasir FLUENT 0 October 9, 2011 02:52 cfd_multiphyiscs CFX 2 March 10, 2010 14:43 F. Bhuiyan CFX 3 August 9, 2009 23:28 Axel Rohde Main CFD Forum 1 November 19, 2001 13:19 ram Main CFD Forum 5 June 17, 2000 21:31

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:01.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top