CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > CFX

Coarsening Rate for Radiation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 13, 2006, 08:00
Default Coarsening Rate for Radiation
Posts: n/a
Hi all,

I am wondering something about the coarsening rate in cfx5.7.1 solver. The intension of it is to reduce the radiation elements in order to same computing time. The problem is that when I model a thin participating solid and the cell numbers on the thickness direction are only about 25 or 35 (hex), if this direction is divided by the default coarsening rate (64) I should have less than 1 radiation element along the thickness, this is confusing because the solver doesn't show any message about this and continue the simulation. While if this is the way the coarsening algorithm does, I want about 15 radiation elements along the thickness, so my coarsening rate has to be 2, or even without coarsening. This makes the simulation time much longer than a normal calculation. Am I wrong to estimate it by this way?

Thanks a lot

Regards, Forrest

  Reply With Quote

Old   February 13, 2006, 10:32
Default Re: Coarsening Rate for Radiation
Posts: n/a
Dear Forrest,

The coarsening algorithm is not deterministic..You control the target (which may not be achieved under multiple scenarios) coarsening rate, and the CFX solver tries to give you that..

It does not have fine controls on how it coarsens boundary elements, interior elements, or direction of the coarsening.

The coarsening does not cross domain boundaries. If you have a mesh with 10 elements, and you set a coarsening target coarsening rate of a million you get 1 element, same if you set it to 64 (default).. It cannot of course coarsen below 1 element..

Good luck, Opaque..
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 13, 2006, 10:42
Default Re: Coarsening Rate for Radiation
Posts: n/a
Opaque, thanks a lot for your answering, you are helpful always.

So if I have 20 cells across one direction of a domain and I used a target coarsening rate 10 (say the actual coarsening rate is the same), it doesn't mean that I have 2 radiation elements along that direction because the algorithm is not deterministic. But how do I judge I have enough radiation elements to resolve radiation along that direction?

Regards, Forrest
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Troubles with heat release rate Xavier Ponticq CFX 4 September 12, 2012 18:49
CFX12 rif errors romance CFX 4 October 26, 2009 14:41
particle, parcel and mass flow rate balance flybird FLUENT 0 May 24, 2007 10:44
Target mass flow rate Saturn FLUENT 0 December 10, 2004 05:18
chemical reaction - decompostition La S. Hyuck CFX 1 May 23, 2001 00:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36.