|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Does anyone out there have experience modelling hydrocyclones or other devices with tangential inlets?
I know that the turbulent anisotropy inherent with the high streamline curvature in these devices necessitates the use of second order closure models (i.e. RSM SSG), but even when I use such a model, the pressure drop predicted by the code (CFX10) seems to severly underpredict the experimentally obtained pressure drop (by a factor of 2). I am running the high resolution scheme as a steady state simulation on a tetra mesh. I am only running single phase and neglecting the air core, does anyone know what type of effect this will have on the pressure drop? I have tried running two phase (water and air core) but get very poor convergence. Anyway, it would be great to hear of other peoples experience. Thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm working on a hydrocyclone, too. You could try to set a max. time step, because I had to reduce it to obtain an air core. And I have to carry out transient simulations to get a good convergence. If you neglecting the air core the pressure drop will be under predicted, because water has a larger area to exhaust from the cyclone. hence, lower velocity, hence lower pressure drop.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
Mohammad Asif
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
hi
i am unable to predict the air core that is in my simulation air core is not forming in the hydrocyclone plz tell me how can i get the air core. thank you |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,931
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What turbulence model are you using?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
New Member
Mohammad Asif
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
i am using turbilence model coz i also have to consider the effects of turbulence as the tangential inlet flow is at very high velocity 3m/sec or 4.5m/sec which causes turbulence.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,931
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sure, but what turbulence model are you using?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
New Member
Mohammad Asif
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
I have tried standard k-epsilon and rsm models but air core is not forming once i have also tried les model but the same thing happened. My overflow and underflow boundary conditions are pressure outlets and i m using steady state pressure based solver.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
New Member
Mohammad Asif
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
and sorry for my earlier silly reply ,at that time i was having headache and thought that u were asking that "why r u using turbulence model".....................
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,931
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No problem.
You are unlikely to get anything realistic with a k-e model. The curvature effects are not captured and you end up with something like solid body rotation. RSM might work, but probably not. From what I know of this topic (it is not my area of expertise) you will need an LES approach to really get it to work. I trust you are not trying to do a steady state LES model. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
New Member
Mohammad Asif
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Thank you for your valuable advice, now i will try to use LES WITH AN UNSTEADY APPROACH
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,931
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I see. The name of LES done in steady state is called a "mistake". I suggest you do some reading on LES approaches before you commence so you know why LES is meaningless in steady state. If you do not understand the approach you will get nowhere.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
New Member
Mohammad Asif
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
hello
i am not getting any aircore using LES in unsteady state solver but i am getting an aircore with air fraction 20% using RSM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,931
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I repeat what I said before about LES. Have you checked that you are using a discretisation scheme with suitable levels of dissipation? Are you sure your mesh size is the correct size relative to the turbulent flow structures you aim to capture? Likewise your timestep?
If you have not done these things you have not done an LES simulation. You might be interested in some 2-eqn, RSM and LES modelling I did years ago on vorticies in a model IC engine. It showed features like an aircore for RSM and LES approaches, and k-e gave solid body rotation. Have a look at http://hdl.handle.net/2100/248 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
New Member
Mohammad Asif
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
ok,thanks for sending me the link............
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,931
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No problem. Chapter 6 is the section I am referring to, it shows the effect of various turbulence models onto vortex features similar to what you are doing.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
New Member
Mohammad Asif
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
thanks again............
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
New Member
Mohammad Asif
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
HI GLENN,
CAN u plz tell me how a gas-liquid interface can be created using VOF. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,931
Rep Power: 145 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1. Do the tutorials. That will show you.
2. Please do not post irrelevant comments on somebody else's thread. Start a new thread. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
New Member
Mohammad Asif
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
thanks,i will start new thread.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Member
arjun
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tokyo, JAPAN
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Hi all,
Could you please tell me how to find pressure drop in cyclone using CFD post or fluent? i have pressure contour which gives highest pressure of 1005 Pa. and lowest pressure of -303 Pa. How to find actual pressure drop in cyclone? See the attachment of contour. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tangential Component of Gradient??? | Kelvin_mk | OpenFOAM | 0 | June 29, 2011 15:30 |
Cylindrical coordinate system - tangential velocity | alessio.nz | OpenFOAM | 2 | December 7, 2010 05:07 |
Cyclone Tangential Velocity ... | Abdul | FLUENT | 2 | August 13, 2008 00:07 |
Multiple Inlets | Charlie V | FLUENT | 0 | May 28, 2001 02:29 |
create Volume with inlets | Roman Bohnes | FLUENT | 10 | December 6, 1999 04:43 |