CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Concluding from Eddy Viscosity Ratio to Total Height of Prisms

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 28, 2019, 10:58
Default Concluding from Eddy Viscosity Ratio to Total Height of Prisms
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 2
pamstad is on a distinguished road
Hello everybody,

my goal is to get an appropriate total height of the prism layer, such that I can capture most (ideally the total boundary layer) of the turbulent boundary layer with my prism elements.

My idea was that I could do that with the help of the Eddy viscosity ratio = turbulent viscosity/dynamic viscosity. For that I plotted the Eddy viscosity ratio (see attached picture)

Now my question is: My prism layer (see also attached picture) lies completely in the dark blue region, where the Eddy viscosity ratio is actually quite small. Wouldn`t it make sense if it has a larger total height? Does it make sense what I have done or how do you determine the total height of your prism layer?


Thanks in advance for your answers and have a nice day!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg EddyViscosityRatioClosePrisms.jpg (121.7 KB, 10 views)
pamstad is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2019, 17:25
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,920
Rep Power: 122
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
My advice is to just try making it bigger and smaller, run the simulation and see what happens. The best way to learn is to do it yourself.

Also read the CFX documentation on numerical considerations for near wall modelling. It has some useful tips as well.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 5, 2019, 03:36
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 2
pamstad is on a distinguished road
Thanks Mr. Horrocks for your answer.

I have read the CFX documentation and several other documents about modelling near the wall.

What bothers me about your suggested approach is the following:

1. Assuming I run some simulations with bigger and smaller Prism layers and obtain some results (assuming all of them fulfil my convergence criterias)

2. Then one of the simulations matches the best, let's say with a measurement I have. Then someone ask me, why I have chosen this specific arrangement of prism layers? And then my answer is because this matches the best with my measurements? Doesn't really make sense to me.


Just to clearify, all my results I've got with different prism layers are in the range of 3 %. I just have a hard time to justify why one would be better than the other and as mentioned again, just because one matches the measurements better than the other is not a real argument to me...


Then coming to my next question: When you run simulations with different parameters, based on what do you decide which results is the "best"? Of course assuming that all the simulations fulfil convergence criteria.


Thanks a lot for your help and have a nice day. I hope you know what I mean.
pamstad is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 5, 2019, 17:30
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 15,920
Rep Power: 122
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
Very good question, it is good to hear that you are thinking about these things. Simulation verification and validation are very important and address the exact question you ask.

Some links to look at:
FAQ: https://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansy..._inaccurate.3F
The key bit on the FAQ is the sensitivity analysis. This allows you to determine if you are converging to an accurate result or if it is just luck that one of your runs in accurate.

Journal of Fluids Engineering has a policy on CFD accuracy: https://journaltool.asme.org/Templat...umAccuracy.pdf

Works by Celik or Roache are excellent on this topic.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Eddy viscosity VS Turbulent viscosity Shayankhan FLUENT 2 February 27, 2019 21:52
Erroneous eddy viscosity ratio for pipe flow preis OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 May 11, 2018 20:58
Eddy viscosity ratio in interDyMFoam? wavemaster OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 March 9, 2014 04:57
Ratio of eddy viscosity to molecular viscosity : Laminar or turbulent flow? JuPa CFX 7 September 9, 2013 08:45
Eddy viscosity ratio to get the boundary layer thickness Cecco CFX 3 May 28, 2013 12:17


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:55.