# problem with GGI interfaces

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 May 25, 2006, 09:09 problem with GGI interfaces #1 strider Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links I similated a flow threw a serie of rectangular pipes including different meshes. I set GGI interfaces between those meshes and the simulation converged. The thing is that when I checked the results, I observed great difference of energy level on each side of the interfaces, even if it's physically the same plane i'm checking. It seems that there is a «numerical» head loss across the interfaces. Am I wrong? Why does it occurs? Can I solve that? Any help would be very apreciated. Thanks strider

 May 25, 2006, 13:20 Re: problem with GGI interfaces #2 Robin Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Strider, The GGI interface will conserve mass, momentum and energy. However, other quantities, such as the total pressure, may change due to the change in your mesh resolution. You would incurr the same losses if your mesh was fully conected but still reduced the mesh density. What exactly are you checking and what energy equation are you solving (ie Thermal or Total Energy)? Regards, Robin

 May 25, 2006, 14:22 Re: problem with GGI interfaces #3 strider Guest   Posts: n/a thank you Robin, it is indeed the mass flow average total pressure that drops across the interfaces. I don't get how energy is conserved but not this variable? The goal of this first simulation is just to simulate the flow in the rotor-stator generator so that the mass flow at different points collapses the experimental data. So it's isothermal for the moment. The rectangular pipes I told you about are the «holes» in the rotor and in the stator that permit the cooling. i think i'll have to check my meshes on both sides of the interfaces, but at first sight the resolutions seem similar. At the stage interface, the pressure is almost the same on each side of the GGI, but the total pressure goes from -4000 to 5000 Pa. by the way, do you think that imposing a porous volume in the pipes is a good idea to adjust the mass flow? For the moment, the bigger part of the flow does not get in the pipes but passes on the upper and lower sides, this does not collapses the experimental data. i apologise if my questions seem a little stupid but i'm a freshly new user and i'm learning at the moment... thanks again! Strider

 May 25, 2006, 15:13 Re: problem with GGI interfaces #4 longbow Guest   Posts: n/a In rotating domain, total pressure is actually relative total pressure, while total pressure in stationary domain is absolute total pressure. Maybe this difference causes the total pressure drop across GGI interface.

 May 26, 2006, 15:44 Re: problem with GGI interfaces #5 Robin Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Strider, Total Pressure is not a conserved quantity and is not energy. Momentum is conserved and either total or static enthalpy is conserved, but your total pressure can still change. Looking at the equation for total pressure in an incompressible fluid with constant Cp: Pt = Ps + 1/2*Density*Velocity^2 Momentum is a conserved quantity and velocity is the momentum per unit mass. If you compute the average total pressure, you can see that it is locally varying by the velocity squared. If you mesh resolution changes, your total pressure will change because the relationship is non-linear and you are not including the entire velocity profile. You would have the same result if you sampled the mesh (or experimental data) at different resolutions and computed the total pressure. What you are seeing is in essence the problem with mesh dependance. If your meshes were roughly the same size on either side of the GGI, the change in total pressure would be negligable. If the mesh resolution changed, but both meshes were sufficient for a mesh independant solution, you would also see very little change. However, since your mesh is not fine enough to capture all the details of the flow, you end up with some numerical diffusion and hence a loss in total pressure. As I pointed out before, the same loss would occur if your mesh were fully connected but the resolution was reduced through a transition region. A GGI just makes it obvious because the change occurs at a 2D location. Regards, Robin

 May 29, 2006, 14:12 Re: problem with GGI interfaces #6 strider Guest   Posts: n/a Thank you Robin, I understand the point. you would make a good teacher, if you are not already! strider

 May 29, 2006, 14:20 Re: problem with GGI interfaces #7 Robin Guest   Posts: n/a Thanks for the compliment. I'm not a teacher, but I have had many similar discussions with CFX customers.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post JFDC FLUENT 1 July 11, 2011 05:59 kabat73 FLUENT 8 May 9, 2010 04:26 hagupta CFX 13 May 5, 2006 12:41 Michael Pi FLUENT 0 July 11, 2005 07:42 Jesper CFX 3 May 14, 2005 18:06