CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Fatal overflow in linear solver error. Why?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 30, 2006, 05:31
Default Fatal overflow in linear solver error. Why?
  #1
zaidun
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
| ERROR #004100018 has occurred in subroutine FINMES. | | Message: | | Fatal overflow in linear solver.

hi i run my analysis using k-epsilon turbulence model and after 9 iterations, above error ocuured. i mesh my model in Gambit and using boundary layer as follows;

-first layer thickness = 0.0001 m -expnasion factor = 1.2 -layer = 20 layer

can anybody give me an idea..

  Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2006, 18:20
Default Re: Fatal overflow in linear solver error. Why?
  #2
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

Your simulation has diverged. Look in the documentation under obtaining convergence.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 1, 2006, 00:31
Default Re: Fatal overflow in linear solver error. Why?
  #3
prayskyer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
this problem happened again to me!Is there any BC not apprcieate for me???i set pressure for inlet,and pressure for outlet ,is it allowed???
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 9, 2006, 09:12
Default Re: Fatal overflow in linear solver error. Why?
  #4
Brendan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
As a quick fix: Did you try adjusting your timestep from automatic to manual?

Divide the recommended auto time step by 10^3 and try it again.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 10, 2016, 08:25
Default
  #5
Member
 
Brett
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 5
Bdew8556 is on a distinguished road
Great response Glenn,

Could you perhaps elaborate on what the physical timescale does?

I am aiming to run a steady flow simulation, what effect does it have in this case?

Cheers (Fellow Australian I see)

Brett
Bdew8556 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 10, 2016, 19:25
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,837
Rep Power: 100
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
Hi Brett,

You certainly have dug up a thread from ancient history here. You are lucky that I am still around I have not seen the other people on this thread for 10 years....

Physical time scale is the rate at which CFX advances the numerical values in a steady state simulation. There are other ways of doing it used in other software such as under-relaxation, but CFX does it by a physical time scale. So a large time scale advances the values a large amount, a small time scale advances it a small amount. Large time scales can approach convergence quicker, but you can only go so fast before the numerics becomes unstable and the simulation diverges.

Note that the physical time scale in a steady state simulation is not the same as time step size in a transient simulation. A steady state simulation has many transient terms removed as they are zero for steady state, whereas a transient simulation includes all the transient terms.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 11, 2016, 04:26
Default
  #7
Member
 
Brett
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 5
Bdew8556 is on a distinguished road
Thanks Glenn, Lucky indeed.

How does that related to the mesh density, ie the dx,dy,dz values? Is it the increment it adds on from the initial values at each cell?

Brett
Bdew8556 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 11, 2016, 05:59
Default
  #8
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 12,837
Rep Power: 100
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
Have a look at the CFX documentation and a CFD textbook for an answer to that question. The spatial discretisation is handled very differently to the time discretisation (for a transient simulation) or the convergence advancement procedure (for a steady state run). I will not describe the difference on the forum as it is far too complex. Hence see a textbook.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fatal Overflow when using RNG k-e Pascal CFX 2 February 5, 2008 17:41
free C code for large sparse matrix linear solver ztdep Main CFD Forum 7 May 24, 2007 14:14
Solver: Fatal Bounds error detected hagupta CFX 5 March 24, 2006 11:17
linear solver overflow peggy CFX 1 February 8, 2001 02:39
solver for linear system with large sparse matrix Yangang Bao Main CFD Forum 1 October 25, 1999 04:22


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:50.