
[Sponsors] 
Error #002100004, Reynolds number is outside of the range.. 

LinkBack  Thread Tools  Search this Thread  Display Modes 
June 21, 2020, 04:39 
Error #002100004, Reynolds number is outside of the range..

#1 
New Member
Sumin Park
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 5 
Hi everyone.
I'm currently analyzing the dry cask which cooling the spent fuel assembly. The spent fuel assembly is 9000W/m3 heat source. But I have a problem in my case. The "Reynolds number" problem occurred when i analyzed my case through Laminar model in the atmosphere domain(you can see that area in figure 1). So, i changed the turbulence model from Laminar(none) to SST. After analysis, the Reynolds number problem disappeared in the atmosphere domain but it occurred in the gap domain(you can see the gap domain in figure 2). The gap domain is very thin hollow cylinder and the thickness is 6mm. I can't understand why the problem is occurred. The Reynolds number in the gap domain is about 52.128. I think it has small value and even i used the SST turbulence model. summary Laminar model > Reynolds number error occurred in Atmosphere domain, SST model > Reynolds number error occurred in gap domain. Please help me... I can't believe my results because of this error. 

June 21, 2020, 05:45 

#2 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,170
Rep Power: 134 
The Reynolds Number "error" really should be a warning only. It is just saying that you should check whether this flow is laminar or not, and if it is turbulent you should use a turbulence model. So rather than just do what it says you should look at this flow and work out whether it is turbulent or not.
Note the Rayliegh number is the nondimensional number of relevance to free convection flows to determine whether it is turbulent or not, not Reynolds Number. (For most free convection cases, anyway). Also I note your residuals are not converging very well. Refer to this FAQ for that issue: https://www.cfdonline.com/Wiki/Ansy...gence_criteria
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. 

June 22, 2020, 10:18 

#3 
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,575
Rep Power: 28 
From the convergence diagnostics, I can tell you are running multiple Mass and Momentum/Heat Transfer subsystems
Unless you setup the case using beta features with nonconstant domain physics (and you know what you are doing after that), I am afraid your setup is missing a few domain interfaces definitions. You may be solving a different problem than you expect. Hope I am mistaken
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. 

June 23, 2020, 02:12 

#4  
New Member
Sumin Park
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 5 
Quote:
I understand about Rayleigh number that distinguish the Turbulent and Laminar. So, Can i neglect the "warning of Reynolds number?" (because the Turbulent and Laminar is decided by Rayleigh number instead of Reynolds number in the Free convection system.) I have a question in terms of Reynolds number. I actually used the turbulence model(SST) in my case. But the Reynolds number warning occurred in the gap domain. I think that this is due to the laminar flow in the gap domain. is it correct?(actually the Reynolds number in the gap domain is about 50.) 

June 23, 2020, 02:16 

#5  
New Member
Sumin Park
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 5 
Quote:
i actually checked the all interfaces but there is no problem.. I read your answer and i understood that the Reynolds number error occurred because of the wrong interfaces, right?? Then,, i will check interfaces again!! 

June 23, 2020, 02:31 

#6 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,170
Rep Power: 134 
If you know Rayleigh number is the important parameter to determine whether the flow is laminar or turbulent then you can ignore the message. But you say the Reynolds number in the gap is 50  you should not be using Reynolds numbers if Rayleigh number is the important parameter. You have to be consistent. You should work out the Rayleigh number in the gap and determine if that Rayleigh number is turbulent.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. 

June 28, 2020, 08:51 

#7  
New Member
Sumin Park
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 5 
Quote:
Let me ask you one more question. Are results i got correct regardless of this error(warning)? For example, because the Reynolds number is exceeded in the special point in the gap domain, so the results i got are wrong. So, the warning occurred. 

June 28, 2020, 17:52 

#8 
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,170
Rep Power: 134 
The warning/error is nothing to do with whether your simulation is accurate. As discussed, Rayleigh number is the important parameter, not Reynolds number.
For the simulation to be accurate you need to consider many more issues than just the Reynolds or Rayleigh numbers. See FAQ: https://www.cfdonline.com/Wiki/Ansy..._inaccurate.3F
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. 

Tags 
cfx, cfx & fluent, heat transfer 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
AMI speed performance  danny123  OpenFOAM  21  October 24, 2020 04:13 
decomposePar allRegions  stru  OpenFOAM PreProcessing  2  August 25, 2015 03:58 
simpleFoam parallel  AndrewMortimer  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  12  August 7, 2015 18:45 
VonKarman vortex street  Reynolds number range  nima_nzm  FLUENT  9  May 26, 2015 11:17 
Reynolds Number Outside the Range ??  Manu  CFX  4  August 29, 2006 12:16 