# 2-D conjugate heat transfer

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 August 2, 2006, 09:07 2-D conjugate heat transfer #1 Barbaros Guest   Posts: n/a I am trying to model steady-state, 2-D (X-Y plane) conjugate heat transfer (CHT) with one fluid two solid domains. It's a simple channel flow type of thing. I am resolving the boundary layer around Y+=0.4 . In CFX you have to use a 3-D geometry to model a 2-D problem. I kept the depth (z-direction) small and only have two nodes in Z direction. For the flow domain I am using symmetry BC but should I use a adiabatic wall for the solid domains' walls in X-Y plane? I'd like to calculate how much of the heat flux goes to the fluid and solid domains. To verify the energy balance in a solid domain, for a steady state HT problem, if I area integrate the wall fluxes around the surfaces, should the result be zero? I am having some problems about this. Interfaces are used between the domains. Thanks for your help.

 August 2, 2006, 10:10 Re: 2-D conjugate heat transfer #2 Ram Dayal Guest   Posts: n/a Dear Barbos I think you should take atleast 3 nodes in z-direction, bocz with 2 nodes each of them will be on the boundary walls which you are specifying as symmetry BC. Regarding solid domain wall BC both BC's are same mathematically. bye Ram Dayal

 August 2, 2006, 17:34 Re: 2-D conjugate heat transfer #3 Glenn Horrocks Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Ram, No, there is no need to use 3 nodes in the z direction for a 2D model. Two works just fine as there is no gradients in the z direction to resolve. Glenn Horrocks

 August 2, 2006, 17:37 Re: 2-D conjugate heat transfer #4 Glenn Horrocks Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, On the high Z and low Z planes use symmetry boundaries. Yes, an area integral of the total heat flux into the solid should give zero (if no heat sources and a steady state simulation). Also have a look at the imbalances in the simulation to check you have accurately balance the heat, often convergence on residuals alone is not sufficient for CHT simulations. Glenn Horrocks

 August 2, 2006, 21:01 Re: 2-D conjugate heat transfer #5 Ram Dayal Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Glenn Thanks for making it more clear for me. Bye Ram Dayal

 August 3, 2006, 07:59 Re: 2-D conjugate heat transfer #6 Barbaros Guest   Posts: n/a Thanks for your response Glenn. I have a heat flux input for the bottom surface. Still heat_in should equal to heat_out since it's a steady state. But I'm getting 0.032W heat flux in vs 0.040W heat flux out. The difference is not acceptable. I kept the iteration up to 1500 but nothing changes.

 August 3, 2006, 15:23 Re: 2-D conjugate heat transfer #7 Barbaros Guest   Posts: n/a Problem SOLVED! I used double precision and it converged.

 August 12, 2006, 01:45 Re: 2-D conjugate heat transfer *NM* #8 SRINIVASULA REDDY PILLI Guest   Posts: n/a

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Chander CFX 2 July 9, 2011 22:22 enigma Main CFD Forum 2 November 1, 2009 23:53 hvem10 FLUENT 2 October 29, 2009 18:31 shankara.2 FLUENT 0 April 21, 2009 15:55 Mark CFX 6 November 15, 2004 16:55

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26.