CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

ERROR#001100279 GGI boundary error

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By ghorrocks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 11, 2021, 14:38
Default ERROR#001100279 GGI boundary error
  #1
New Member
 
Evan
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 7
exm5360 is on a distinguished road
Hello, I'm currently working on a pump design and I'm running into an issue with two stationary domains (which I can best describe as two 90 degree bends) that are connected to one another. I run the case and the following error pops up.

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. |
| Message: |
| Both sides of GGI rotationally periodic boundary condition "Chann- |
| el Bend 1 to Channel Bend 2" have the same axial or radial positi- |
| on. Possible solutions include: (a) check that the condition is s- |
| pecified properly; (b) check that the rotation axis for the perio- |
| dic condition is set properly; (c) decrease the value of the expe- |
| rt parameter "ggi periodic axial radial -ErrMsg buffer overflow- |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ERROR #001100279 has occurred in subroutine ErrAction. |
| Message: |
| Stopped in routine SRF_CORRECT_44 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

Here are some of my setup parameters for this Channel 1 to Channel 2

-The outlet of channel 1 is interfaced to the inlet of channel 2 with a rotational periodicity.
exm5360 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 11, 2021, 18:28
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,017
Rep Power: 146
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
The error message seems to be quite clear - you have set your GGI to be rotationally periodic but the two faces are on top of each other. It sounds like you just want a normal (not periodic) GGI interface to simply connect two mesh regions.
aero_head likes this.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2025, 09:09
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Jiri
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 228
Rep Power: 14
Jiricbeng is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I have the same problem. However, it looks like some weird tolerance issue. I have the periodic surfaces selected well, it is not the problem of course. But I found that if I increase the domain axially, then this error disappears and it works. But when I decrease the axial distance of my domain to about 0.1mm, I this error is back. I use Ansys meshing, I tried .cmdb and .cngs meshes, change tolerances in mesh import, but nothing works.

By the way, the error says to decrease the expert parameter ""ggi periodic axial radial", but I cannot see it anyway.

Another interesting point is that when I used similar geometry coming from turbogrid (as .gtm) to the same CFX, it worked... this lead me to focusing on some tolerances.

I will be glad for any advice.
Jiricbeng is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2025, 19:51
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,017
Rep Power: 146
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
If it is just a tolerancing issue like you suggest then add the expert parameter to change the tolerance. You can add expert parameters through CFX-Pre, or directly into CCL. Note that CFX-Pre does not have all the expert parameters available, some of them are only available through CCL. So this one might be a CCL only one.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 29, 2025, 05:24
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Jiri
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 228
Rep Power: 14
Jiricbeng is on a distinguished road
Super, it works. I added the expert parameter via command editor.

Thank you!
Jiricbeng is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cfx

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[blockMesh] blockMesh with double grading. spwater OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 92 January 12, 2019 10:00
[OpenFOAM] Native ParaView Reader Bugs tj22 ParaView 270 January 4, 2016 12:39
[swak4Foam] GroovyBC the dynamic cousin of funkySetFields that lives on the suburb of the mesh gschaider OpenFOAM Community Contributions 300 October 29, 2014 19:00
Errors in UDF shashank312 Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 6 May 30, 2013 21:30
Problem with compile the setParabolicInlet ivanyao OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 September 5, 2008 21:50


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59.