CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Mesh independency study

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree6Likes
  • 2 Post By karachun
  • 3 Post By ghorrocks
  • 1 Post By ghorrocks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 20, 2021, 17:18
Default Mesh independency study
  #1
Member
 
Sara
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 6
Knowledge is on a distinguished road
Hi guys

I have to do a mesh independency study. What makes it difficult is that it is not steady-state mode, but transient. Is it enough to compare e.g. three time-points for each mesh and thereby determine the mesh independency? Or what is the most common approach?

Thanks!
Knowledge is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 20, 2021, 17:49
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
karachun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 248
Rep Power: 12
karachun is on a distinguished road
Yes, based on 3 points you can make extrapolation (Richardson's extrapolation) and determine the result "at infinity" and determine how far is your result from the "ideal" result.
Here is a link to an article.
https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/wind/va.../spatconv.html
Knowledge and Mojtaba_M like this.
karachun is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 20, 2021, 23:38
Default
  #3
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,001
Rep Power: 146
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Alexander, Richardson Extrapolation is for 3 different mesh sizes so you can extrapolate to zero mesh size (the theoretical ideal mesh). I read Sara's request as she has 3 time points in a transient simulation she is interested in, so Richardson extrapolation is not relevant for this.

Sara: mesh independency checks should be done on a parameter which is important for what you are trying to do. If the value of a variable at those three time points is important to you then yes, this is a good approach. If the time average is more important then you should use that, or if the period of the flow oscillation is important then you should use that. Whatever is important to you.

The concept of mesh independency is very similar in steady state and transient simulations.
karachun, aero_head and Knowledge like this.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 22, 2021, 04:28
Default
  #4
Member
 
Sara
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 6
Knowledge is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
Alexander, Richardson Extrapolation is for 3 different mesh sizes so you can extrapolate to zero mesh size (the theoretical ideal mesh). I read Sara's request as she has 3 time points in a transient simulation she is interested in, so Richardson extrapolation is not relevant for this.

Sara: mesh independency checks should be done on a parameter which is important for what you are trying to do. If the value of a variable at those three time points is important to you then yes, this is a good approach. If the time average is more important then you should use that, or if the period of the flow oscillation is important then you should use that. Whatever is important to you.

The concept of mesh independency is very similar in steady state and transient simulations.
Would it then be fine to look at e.g. three time-point for each mesh-size e.g. 6 different mesh-sizes and then observe if there is a difference between the mesh-sizes based on the parameter-values for three-time points obtained for each mesh-size? Can you recommend me an article?
Knowledge is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 22, 2021, 04:47
Default
  #5
Member
 
Sara
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 6
Knowledge is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by karachun View Post
Yes, based on 3 points you can make extrapolation (Richardson's extrapolation) and determine the result "at infinity" and determine how far is your result from the "ideal" result.
Here is a link to an article.
https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/wind/va.../spatconv.html
Can I use Richardson's extrapolation when I have transiet-mode? Maybe it's better just to choose one time-point for each mesh-size? And then I should just choose to look into three mesh-sizes e.g. coarse, medium and fine? And if I whish I can do it for several other time-points.
Knowledge is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 22, 2021, 06:01
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,001
Rep Power: 146
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
You can use Richardson Extrapolation to approximate the ideal mesh and the ideal time step size. But I would do both as separate exercises. If you are trying to do both at the same time then I will refer you back to the derivation of Richardson Extrapolation and you can work out the maths for yourself.

To answer your question, yes, you can use Richardson Extrapolation for transient simulations. A good way to do this is to select an important parameter at a specific time point on all the different mesh resolution simulations, and do Richardson Extrapolation on that.

The classic text on CFD accuracy is "Computational Fluid Dynamics" by Roache. He did al lot of the fundamental work in defining how accurate CFD simulations are.
Opaque likes this.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[snappyHexMesh] Creating multiple multiple cell zones with snappyHexMesh - a newbie in deep water! divergence OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 0 January 23, 2019 05:17
mesh sensitivity study pangxiongx Main CFD Forum 0 August 24, 2018 13:05
Mesh motion with Translation & Rotation Doginal CFX 2 January 12, 2014 07:21
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! sc298 OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 March 27, 2011 22:11
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? Joe CFX 2 March 26, 2007 19:10


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:02.