|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Sara
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Hi guys
I have to do a mesh independency study. What makes it difficult is that it is not steady-state mode, but transient. Is it enough to compare e.g. three time-points for each mesh and thereby determine the mesh independency? Or what is the most common approach? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 248
Rep Power: 12 ![]() |
Yes, based on 3 points you can make extrapolation (Richardson's extrapolation) and determine the result "at infinity" and determine how far is your result from the "ideal" result.
Here is a link to an article. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/wind/va.../spatconv.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,001
Rep Power: 146 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Alexander, Richardson Extrapolation is for 3 different mesh sizes so you can extrapolate to zero mesh size (the theoretical ideal mesh). I read Sara's request as she has 3 time points in a transient simulation she is interested in, so Richardson extrapolation is not relevant for this.
Sara: mesh independency checks should be done on a parameter which is important for what you are trying to do. If the value of a variable at those three time points is important to you then yes, this is a good approach. If the time average is more important then you should use that, or if the period of the flow oscillation is important then you should use that. Whatever is important to you. The concept of mesh independency is very similar in steady state and transient simulations.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Sara
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Sara
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 18,001
Rep Power: 146 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You can use Richardson Extrapolation to approximate the ideal mesh and the ideal time step size. But I would do both as separate exercises. If you are trying to do both at the same time then I will refer you back to the derivation of Richardson Extrapolation and you can work out the maths for yourself.
To answer your question, yes, you can use Richardson Extrapolation for transient simulations. A good way to do this is to select an important parameter at a specific time point on all the different mesh resolution simulations, and do Richardson Extrapolation on that. The classic text on CFD accuracy is "Computational Fluid Dynamics" by Roache. He did al lot of the fundamental work in defining how accurate CFD simulations are.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum. |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [snappyHexMesh] Creating multiple multiple cell zones with snappyHexMesh - a newbie in deep water! | divergence | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | January 23, 2019 05:17 |
| mesh sensitivity study | pangxiongx | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 24, 2018 13:05 |
| Mesh motion with Translation & Rotation | Doginal | CFX | 2 | January 12, 2014 07:21 |
| [snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 22:11 |
| Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |