CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX


Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 22, 2006, 00:26
Default Timescale
Posts: n/a
Can someone please explain to me the use of a timescale in CFX for steady state problems..... Is'nt a timestep needed only to solve transient problems? What is the significance of this timestep in steady state problems....?

Thanks in advance
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 22, 2006, 08:16
Default Re: Timescale
Posts: n/a
The physical timestep is a means of underrelaxing the solution in a physically meaningful way as it iterates toward the steady solution.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 24, 2006, 09:48
Default Re: Timescale
Posts: n/a
In simple words. When we give inlet conditions and outlet conditions, they are only at the boundaries. so the rest of the domain is empty so to speak at time zero. So the solution has to progress in time no matter what, even if it has to go to steady state solution. The Steady state itself , means the variations with time becomes zero (almost), but it is not neccesarily at a physical time zero.

  Reply With Quote

Old   December 26, 2006, 08:35
Default Re: Timescale
Posts: n/a

i think, this concept is covered in tutorials.

Time scale can be given by

distance travel/inlet velocity.

check the tutorial of Static Mixer for more details.

bye aero
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2006, 14:49
Default Re: Timescale
Posts: n/a
Hi Luke,

there is a nice non-commercial CFD explaination of this in Versteeg and Malalasekera's book an Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics, 8.8

They show nicely how under-relaxation and pseudo-transient advance to steady state have a very close relation. They give the formula. ... either believe me or refer to the book.

"This formula shows that it is possible to achieve the effects of under-relaxed iterative steady state calculations from a given initial field by means of a pseudo-transient computation starting from the same initial field by taking a step size that is given by eq 8.48....The pseudo-transient approach is useful for situatyions in which goveringinewuqations gives rise to stability problems eq buoyand flows, highly swirling flows and compressible flows with shocks."

It has been my experience as well that what I will call "hard to solve problems" converge more reliably and faster with this method. Unfortuntatly, some problems have a wide range of time scales and are not well suited to this method as there is some stability limit governed by the smallest time scale in the problem which prevents using a large time step.

Best Regards,

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
When to use local timescale or physical timescale xyq102296 CFX 23 June 25, 2014 07:55
Determination of physical timescale Chander CFX 2 October 19, 2011 19:47
Solid Timescale Control Parthipan CFX 2 August 24, 2007 10:07
Advice on Physical Timescale Oli CFX 0 January 16, 2007 11:41
SST in 2D? Jesper Sørensen CFX 16 December 23, 2006 09:40

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:02.