CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Average passge method

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 16, 2007, 05:55
Default Average passge method
  #1
sam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hey freinds Is Average passage method is included in CFX for turbomachinery.

  Reply With Quote

Old   February 18, 2007, 16:51
Default Re: Average passge method
  #2
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I am not familiar with this. Do you mean the average residence time? You can calculate this in CFX-Post by generating a sample of streamlines through the model and colouring by time. The time value as they leave the domain is the residence time of that streamline.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 19, 2007, 23:12
Default Re: Average passge method
  #3
sam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Glenn, It is about the interface between rotating and non rotating interface. it is advance approach then mixing plane. Regards
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 20, 2007, 16:03
Default Re: Average passge method
  #4
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Do you mean the various methods of modelling rotor/stator interactions, such as frozen rotor, transient rotor/stator etc?

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 21, 2007, 23:48
Default Re: Average passge method
  #5
Michele Cagna
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi sam,

in case you mean the method of deterministic stresses: No it is not included.

Michele Cagna
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 22, 2007, 10:42
Default Re: Average passge method
  #6
Bak_Flow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
From a recent technical note:

http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/serv...cvips&gifs=yes

In layman's terms:

The correct way to solve a turbomachine would be to solve the full geometry from inlet to outlet for all scales of motion.

This would of course mean the all blade rows, all passages, and turbulent scales of motion. We know that for most engineering analysis this is too much effort and more info that we really need because we are going to average it anyhow to get average torque, total pressure rise, efficiency, etc.

In any flow we deal with the unsteadyness of turbulence by averaging the equations: called the RANS equations....these introduce unknown terms called the Reynolds Stresses and Reynolds Fluxes. Which really are the "effect" of the unsteady transport at scales that are not solved. So we need a model for these terms.

In a turbomachine there is a natural unsteadyness from blades passing each other (also looked at as passages passing each other). We could solve for this scale of motion and sometimes do if we are interested in something relevant to the transient...like flutter, etc. However, this is a lot of work and often more that we neet.....see this parallels the issues above in turbulence. So if we average over the scale of motion caused by the passages passing each other.....Average Passage...we get....

you guessed it....unknown terms from the "effect" of the neglected detail....Adamczyk called these Deterministic Stresses....since the passage motion is Deterministic! So you need a model for this....right!

How does mixing plane fit in well this is circumferentially averaging flow variables at the interface.

The technical note has some references. There also are a few handbooks now that cover this.

To my knowledge none of the big 3 commercial codes have this model.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Bak_Flow
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 27, 2007, 16:23
Default Re: Average passge method
  #7
sam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
thanks every one I got the answer to my full satisfication. I thank to Glenn, Michele and Bac_flow for there technical help .

One more question, is this method difficult to program?

  Reply With Quote

Old   February 28, 2007, 16:30
Default Re: Average passge method
  #8
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I haven't looked at Bak_Flow's reference because I don't have a log in, but from his description it looks like it results in modifications to the turbulence mathematical model. This should not be attempted by the inexperienced and is likely to be difficult to implement.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Floating point exception error Alan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 11 July 1, 2021 21:51
[Gmsh] discretizer - gmshToFoam Andyjoe OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 13 March 14, 2012 04:35
Fluent 6.3.26 vs 12.1 and partition method Anorky FLUENT 0 April 27, 2010 10:55
Comparison: Finite Volume Method vs. Analytic Method m-fry Main CFD Forum 1 April 20, 2010 14:40
Code for most powerfull FDV Method D.S.Nasan Main CFD Forum 6 September 4, 2008 02:08


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59.