# Darreius problems

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 March 1, 2007, 15:35 Darreius problems #1 DGaden Guest   Posts: n/a Hey folks, I'm having a bugger of a time with a 2D darreius turbine simulation. The solution looks intuitively "okay", except the torque is backwards, predicting power loss instead of power production. Worse yet, I have real experimental data to compare against, and it's almost exactly opposite torque. I've been banging my head on the wall, and triple checked all my calculations. The forces all add up to a backwards torque! There must be a flipped sign in there somewhere, but I can't find it. Perhaps I don't understand rotating reference frames. How would you do a 2D darrieus turbine? -I created a circular mesh region around the blades and hub -Set it as a rotating domain in the direction the blades should rotate. (When I move timestep forward in post, the mesh moves the way the blades should.) -Set the interface as "Transient rotor / stator" Am I doing something wrong? Should I do something with a rotating mesh, but not using a "Rotating Reference Frame"? Or is the CFD just that wrong? -Dave Gaden

 March 1, 2007, 16:19 Re: Darreius problems #2 opaque Guest   Posts: n/a Dear DGaden, The sign of the force on fluid is opposite to the sign of the force on the wall. From which side are you interpreting the results? Opaque

 March 1, 2007, 16:55 Re: Darreius problems #3 DGaden Guest   Posts: n/a Thanks for the suggestion, but it's not that. I'm calculating the forces from the wall: ! \$Fx=force("BLADE","X") The forces I get make sense: the upwind blade experiences a large downstream force; cross-stream forces correspond nicely when the blade is tilted 45 degrees, like a kite. I think the problem is either: -Something with the rotating reference frame... like "it should be a rotating wall instead of a rotating domain", or -CFD is not good at calculating drag / lift forces.

 March 2, 2007, 02:27 Re: Darreius problems #4 Johnny Guest   Posts: n/a Make sure you have angular velocity signed correctly - CFX uses the right hand rule - thumb in the positive axis of rotation direction, fingers curl in the positive direction. Sign on your angular velocity will then refer to the direction in which the blades move.

 March 2, 2007, 13:59 Re: Darreius problems #5 DGaden Guest   Posts: n/a Thanks for the suggestion, Johnny. I have used the RHR, and double checked it with manual calculations of x,y forces and their component distances. Everything adds up right... except it's backwards... darnit.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post tommymoose ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 August 5, 2011 16:02 Mechstud Main CFD Forum 4 July 26, 2011 12:13 Micha Siemens 0 August 6, 2003 13:55 Ivan de Miguel Urain FLUENT 1 November 16, 2001 10:36 Hassid Samuel FLUENT 0 February 23, 2001 07:04

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19.