# re: Source Coefficient

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 April 23, 2007, 12:43 re: Source Coefficient #1 Wooster Guest   Posts: n/a I have a model with volumetric heat generation. There isn't much explanation of the "source coefficient" for volumetric heating and I was wondering if anyone knew how important this is to the final answer. At the moment, I'm getting more power out than I put in (m_dot*cp*dt) and, while it could be a number of things, I'd like to see if it could be that I need to enter a valid source coefficient to correlate the data. -M

 April 25, 2007, 14:10 Re: re: Source Coefficient #2 Gert-Jan Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Wooster, In a converged solution, the source coefficient does not influence the final value of the generated heat. It only helps to get a converged solution by - more or less -underrelaxing the source term. If you have a source A, you should define a source coefficient between -A*1e-10 and -A*1. The first implies a weak underrelaxation. Then in general you do not require a lot of iterations but the solution might become unstable and you won't get a converged solution at all. The latter implies a strong underrelaxation. Then you might end up with a converged solution but you will need a lot of iterations. Just try to find out what suites you best. If you get more power out than you put in, you should monitor you imbalances. If this isn't equal to zero, you need more iterations. Regs, Gert-Jan www.bunova.nl Mazze[ITA] and r.mojtaba like this.

 April 25, 2007, 15:37 Re: re: Source Coefficient #3 Wooster Guest   Posts: n/a Thanks for the feedback. I wasn't 100% sure how the source coefficient worked and the manual is slightly confusing on how it works. I think my problem with the power is due to the text file I was using had higher energy particles than what was measured in the benchmark, but I need to explore different reasons. By imbalances, do you mean residuals? The residuals converge at about 26-30 iterations. The main residuals keeping it out that long are w-momentum and energy. w-momentum is just a function of my wild geometry. -M

 April 26, 2007, 04:16 Re: re: Source Coefficient #4 Gert-Jan Guest   Posts: n/a No, I do not mean residuals. In the solver manager you should create a new Monitor and then select that in submenu IMBALANCE you want to monitor mass, energy, momentum etc. These all should go to zero, meaning that what you put in comes out as well. Gert-Jan www.bunova.nl

 April 26, 2007, 09:40 Re: re: Source Coefficient #5 Wooster Guest   Posts: n/a Ok, thanks, I'll take a look at it and see what I can find. -M

 April 26, 2007, 15:43 Re: re: Source Coefficient #6 Phil Guest   Posts: n/a The source coefficient should just be an estimate of dS/dT.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post GGerber OpenFOAM Installation 54 April 24, 2015 16:02 mksca OpenFOAM Programming & Development 13 August 18, 2014 22:26 Greg Givogue OpenFOAM Programming & Development 3 March 4, 2011 18:18 hjasak OpenFOAM Post-Processing 69 April 24, 2008 01:24 jens_klostermann OpenFOAM Bugs 11 June 28, 2007 17:51

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:38.