|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hello i have a question about FSI , why we all trying to make fsi with coupling like cfx and ansys ,,,, abaqus and fluent or star cd and we are not using dytran or ls dyna???
the coupling offer us somthing that the dytran or ls dyna can not offer us??? best regards hayate |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
One of the reasons is maybe because, ANSYS FLOTRAN just gives you basic fluid solving capabilities, and very little mesh control.
I am not even sure, if LS Dyna can do a coupled analysis! So ignore my comment, if it is actually very powerful and i don't know about it. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Restart FSI run on ANSYS CFX | lingdeer | CFX | 3 | October 10, 2011 10:47 |
FSI using Ansys LS-Dyna and CFX | YY | CFX | 2 | April 9, 2008 07:40 |
FSI using fluent and abaqus vs ls dyna or dytran | HAYATE | FLUENT | 2 | September 18, 2007 09:16 |
FSI using abaqus and star cd vs ls dyna or dytran | HAYATE | Siemens | 0 | September 16, 2007 04:27 |
FSI using CFX and ANSYS | Bi Chang | CFX | 2 | May 10, 2005 05:47 |